-1). This study demonstrated strong seasonal variations in microbial CO uptake and complex influences of various biotic and abiotic variables on this process.KEY WORDS: Carbon monoxide · Microbial uptake · Seasonal variation · Temperature dependence · Bacteria · Suspended particles · Estuarine waters · Gulf of St. Lawrence
Resale or republication not permitted without written consent of the publisherMar Ecol Prog Ser 389: [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29] 2009 on relatively easily obtainable biotic and abiotic variables.Microbial CO uptake is expected to vary seasonally due to changes in such factors as bacterial cell abundance and species composition, water temperature (T) and supply of nutrients. Butler et al. (1987) have reported the only 4-season microbial CO uptake turnover times, which were obtained from Yaquina Bay, Oregon, but gave no details of the CO uptake seasonality and its possible links to other environmental variables. Moreover, the 14 C technique they employed may not adequately characterize the CO uptake kinetics when ambient CO concentration, [CO], is high or large amounts of 14 C-labelled CO are added (Tolli & Taylor 2005, Xie et al. 2005, 2009. Although temperature is a well-known key factor that controls bacterial activity in general (e.g. Shiah & Ducklow 1994), the extent of T-dependence of microbial CO uptake remains unclear. Recent findings reveal that ambient seawater CO concentration can also influence microbial CO uptake kinetics as a result of unexpectedly high enzymatic affinities for CO expressed by CO-oxidizing bacteria (Tolli & Taylor 2005, Xie et al. 2005, 2009). While CO uptake generally follows or can be approximated as first-order kinetics at low ambient [CO], mixed-order, saturation or even inhibition kinetics can occur at elevated [CO] (Zafiriou et al. 2003, Xie et al. 2005, 2009). The latter requires Michaelis-Menten kinetics to derive limiting rates, V max , and half-saturation substrate concentrations, K m , that more accurately characterize this process. Data in the literature on V max and K m of microbial CO uptake are scarce and cover only limited seasons and areas (salinity usually > 28) (Tolli & Taylor 2005, Xie et al. 2005, 2009. Evidently, more MichaelisMenten kinetics studies are needed to characterize CO consumption on larger salinity and seasonal scales. In a cross-system assessment encompassing warm, cold (Arctic), coastal and open ocean waters, Xie et al. (2005) have demonstrated that the first-order rate constant of microbial CO uptake (K co ) positively correlates with chlorophyll a concentration, [chl a], a proxy of primary productivity. This correlation is, however, based only on summer data in warm waters and autumn data in Arctic waters. The Arctic spring data acquired later failed to support this relation, thus invalidating [chl a] as an all-season indicator for K co in the Arctic (Xie et al. 2009).The present study goes beyond previous investigations to examine a high mid-latitude estuarine system: the Gulf of St. Lawrence and ...