Dark matter substructures affect dark matter-electron scattering in xenon-based direct detection experiments

Abstract

Recent sky surveys have discovered a large number of stellar substructures. It is highly likely that there are dark matter (DM) counterparts to these stellar substructures. We examine the implications of DM substructures for electron recoil (ER) direct detection (DD) rates in dual phase xenon experiments. We have utilized the results of the LAMOST survey and considered a few benchmark substructures in our analysis. Assuming that these substructures constitute 10% of the local DM density, we study the discovery limits of DM-electron scattering cross sections considering one kg-year exposure and 1, 2, and 3 electron thresholds. With this exposure and threshold, it is possible to observe the effect of the considered DM substructure for the currently allowed parameter space. We also explore the sensitivity of these experiments in resolving the DM substructure fraction. For all the considered cases, we observe that DM having mass $$ \mathcal{O}(10) $$ O 10 MeV has a better prospect in resolving substructure fraction as compared to $$ \mathcal{O}(100) $$ O 100 MeV scale DM. We also find that within the currently allowed DM-electron scattering cross-section; these experiments can resolve the substructure fraction (provided it has a non-negligible contribution to the local DM density) with good accuracy for $$ \mathcal{O}(10) $$ O 10 MeV DM mass with one electron threshold.

Probing the Dark Matter Capture Rate in a Local Population of Brown Dwarfs with IceCube Gen 2

“…IceCube has a very active program for the indirect detection of DM and can set the limits in SI/SD DM-nucleon cross-section for GeV-to-TeV parameter space. In recent times, several studies have probed the neutrinos originating from captured DM in the core of celestial objects [19,[21][22][23]43,[85][86][87].…”

Neutrino constraints on inelastic dark matter captured in the Sun

“…The subsequent decays of the mesons result in neutrinos that escape the Sun. In detailed models of DM, it is also possible that the dominant annihilation channel is to leptons or beyond standard model particles [58][59][60], however, we do not consider these models here. We also ignore the details of the mediator and only assume scalar contact interactions.…”

The impact of the Large Magellanic Cloud on dark matter direct detection signals

“…Sky Survey (SDSS) [17] there is significant evidence that the MW contains kinematically distinct substructures due to its non-quiescent formation and merger history [18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25] (see also [26][27][28]). Recent hydrodynamical simulations and idealized models including specific substructures similar to those observed in Gaia show departures from the SHM that bear important implications for DM direct detection searches [7,29].…”