1998
DOI: 10.1086/305753
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dark Matter Concentration in the Galactic Center

Abstract: It is shown that the matter concentration observed through stellar motion at the galactic center (Eckart & Genzel, 1997, MNRAS, 284, 576 and Genzel et al., 1996, ApJ, 472, 153) is consistent with a supermassive object of 2.5 × 10 6 solar masses composed of self-gravitating, degenerate heavy neutrinos, as an alternative to the black hole interpretation. According to the observational data, the lower bounds on possible neutrino masses are m ν ≥ 12.0 keV/c 2 for g = 2 or m ν ≥ 14.3 keV/c 2 for g = 1, where g is … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
63
0
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
63
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The first phase of these experiments yielded proper motion velocities, which increased the implied dark matter density by 3 orders of magnitude to 10 12 M /pc 3 Ghez et al 1998). This eliminated a cluster of dark objects, such as neutron stars or stellar mass black holes, as a possible explanation of the Galaxy's central dark mass concentration (Maoz et al 1998) and left only the fermion ball hypothesis (e.g., Tsiklauri & Viollier 1998, Munyaneza & Viollier 2002 as an alternative to a single supermassive black hole. The velocity dispersion measurements also localized the dark matter to ±100 mas (4 milli-pc) at a position consistent with the nominal location of the unusual radio source Sgr A* (Ghez et al 1998), whose emission is posited to arise from accretion onto a central supermassive black hole (e.g., Lo et al 1985).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first phase of these experiments yielded proper motion velocities, which increased the implied dark matter density by 3 orders of magnitude to 10 12 M /pc 3 Ghez et al 1998). This eliminated a cluster of dark objects, such as neutron stars or stellar mass black holes, as a possible explanation of the Galaxy's central dark mass concentration (Maoz et al 1998) and left only the fermion ball hypothesis (e.g., Tsiklauri & Viollier 1998, Munyaneza & Viollier 2002 as an alternative to a single supermassive black hole. The velocity dispersion measurements also localized the dark matter to ±100 mas (4 milli-pc) at a position consistent with the nominal location of the unusual radio source Sgr A* (Ghez et al 1998), whose emission is posited to arise from accretion onto a central supermassive black hole (e.g., Lo et al 1985).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Degenerate stars of fermions in the mass range between 10 and 25 keV are particularly interesting [2], as they could explain, without resorting to the black-hole hypothesis, at least some of the features observed around the supermassive compact dark objects with masses in the range of M = 1 0 6 : 5 to 10 9:5 solar masses, that are reported to exist at the centers of a number of galaxies [3, 4, 5, 6, 7 , 8 ], including our own [9,10], and quasistellar objects (QSO) [11,12,13,14]. Indeed, there is little dierence between a supermassive black hole and a fermion star of the same mass near the OV limit, a few Schwarzschild radii away from the object [15,16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The physics of fermion balls as a model for the dark matter distribution at galactic centers has been studied in a series of papers. [113][114][115][116][117][118][119] For realistic models an integral over a temperature distribution is required, and a boundary condition has to be used to represent the surface of the dark matter star both in real space as in momentum space. This then allows the mass of this dark matter star to increase further.…”
Section: Galaxiesmentioning
confidence: 99%