2014
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stu1984
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dark halo microphysics and massive black hole scaling relations in galaxies

Abstract: We investigate the black hole (BH) scaling relation in galaxies using a model in which the galaxy halo and central BH are a self-gravitating sphere of dark matter (DM) with an isotropic, adiabatic equation of state. The equipotential where the escape velocity approaches the speed of light defines the horizon of the BH. We find that the BH mass (m • ) depends on the DM entropy, when the effective thermal degrees of freedom (F ) are specified. Relations between BH and galaxy properties arise naturally, with the … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 324 publications
(400 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Power-law fits to these correlations provide efficient means to estimate black hole masses in a statistically significant sample (Beifiori et al 2012;McConnell & Ma 2013). Several authors have argued the empirical scaling relations are rooted in a more fundamental relation between M BH and properties of the host galaxy dark matter halo, such as the halo virial mass (M vir DM ) or v max circ = GM (<r) r | max , the maximum circular velocity achieved beyond the bulge (e.g., Ferrarese 2002;Saxton et al 2014;Larkin & McLaughlin 2016). In this work we use v max circ as provided by numerical simulations that trace DM halo evolution from primordial density fluctuations in combination with the correlation found between M BH and the stellar velocity dispersion of the bulge σ.…”
Section: A Redshift Dependent M Bh − σ Relationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Power-law fits to these correlations provide efficient means to estimate black hole masses in a statistically significant sample (Beifiori et al 2012;McConnell & Ma 2013). Several authors have argued the empirical scaling relations are rooted in a more fundamental relation between M BH and properties of the host galaxy dark matter halo, such as the halo virial mass (M vir DM ) or v max circ = GM (<r) r | max , the maximum circular velocity achieved beyond the bulge (e.g., Ferrarese 2002;Saxton et al 2014;Larkin & McLaughlin 2016). In this work we use v max circ as provided by numerical simulations that trace DM halo evolution from primordial density fluctuations in combination with the correlation found between M BH and the stellar velocity dispersion of the bulge σ.…”
Section: A Redshift Dependent M Bh − σ Relationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The goal of the present study is to strengthen the case for a very early feedback process between the growth of the total stellar population mass of a bulge (or a galaxy) and the growth of its central massive body. The mo-tivation to consider a very early feedback comes from the correlation between the mass of the SMBH and the properties of its host galaxy (bulge; e.g., Benedetto et al 2013;Graham, & Scott 2013;Saxton et al 2014), in particular the total stellar mass. The properties of the bulge-SMBH masses correlation itself shows that this correlation cannot be driven by many mergers of low mass galaxies (Ginat et al 2016).…”
Section: Discussion and Summarymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One possible explanation is that both properties are associated with a common event such as major mergers, thus galaxies experimenting a recent major merger should have a large MBH mass and GC populations (e.g., Jahnke & Macciò 2011). The total mass of GCs and the central black hole mass can also correlate with the bulge binding energy in elliptical galaxies (e.g., Snyder et al 2011;Saxton et al 2014). Rapid growth of the nuclear black hole of a galaxy might be fuelled by a massive inflow of cold gas towards the centre of the galaxy.…”
Section: Irrmentioning
confidence: 99%