2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.12.049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dark fermentation of complex waste biomass for biohydrogen production by pretreated thermophilic anaerobic digestate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
37
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 116 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Throughout the VFA fermentation experiment, the pH remained high (7.7) for CS, while fell to 5.7 with FW (Table ) mainly due to the acidification of the initially acidic substrate. Previously, it has been reported that lowering the process pH from neutral to acidic decreases propionic acid ratios and increases butyric (Dareioti et al, ; Ghimire et al, ) and valeric acid (Albuquerque, Eiroa, Torres, Nunes, & Reis, ) ratios, which explains the VFA profile in the present study. Additionally, the process pH is also known to affect the hydrolysis of substrates (Jankowska et al, ), where the acidic environment of the FW fermentation at a pH of around 6 most likely favored hydrolyzing enzyme production, which led to higher VFA yields with FW compared to CS fermentation (pH >7).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Throughout the VFA fermentation experiment, the pH remained high (7.7) for CS, while fell to 5.7 with FW (Table ) mainly due to the acidification of the initially acidic substrate. Previously, it has been reported that lowering the process pH from neutral to acidic decreases propionic acid ratios and increases butyric (Dareioti et al, ; Ghimire et al, ) and valeric acid (Albuquerque, Eiroa, Torres, Nunes, & Reis, ) ratios, which explains the VFA profile in the present study. Additionally, the process pH is also known to affect the hydrolysis of substrates (Jankowska et al, ), where the acidic environment of the FW fermentation at a pH of around 6 most likely favored hydrolyzing enzyme production, which led to higher VFA yields with FW compared to CS fermentation (pH >7).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…Tests were done in 500 ml bottles, with a liquid volume of 400 ml. The substrate/inoculum VS:VS ratio was 0.5 (Ghimire et al, 2015;Kuruti, Nakkasunchi, Begum, Juntupally, & Arelli, 2017) with inoculum volumes from 214 to 300 g per bottle (Table 1). Distilled water was added to achieve the desired liquid volume.…”
Section: Batch Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the OP derived from the olive oil industry constitutes a promising biomass resource because of its potential utilization for energy purposes. It offers, at the same time, a solution to the management problems connected to this by‐product …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Fats and lipids in dairy waste and wastewater are not bio-accessible carbon and nutrient sources for H 2 producing microorganisms [14,15]. Hydrolysis of dairy waste materials is able to convert lactose to galactose and glucose from fats and lipids, improving substrate availability and suppression of methanogenic activity [15,16]. In addition, hydrolysis of cheese whey by hydrodynamic cavitation under alkaline condition inhibited the lactic acid bacteria and thus improved H 2 production yield [17].…”
Section: Hydrogenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main advantage of the bio-hythane process is the low cost and high energy yield. The key bioengineering strategy for hythane production is to control the acidogenesis, acetogenesis and methanogenesis stages to reach a hydrogen/methane ratio suitable for hythane [16,18 ].…”
Section: Hythanementioning
confidence: 99%