2011
DOI: 10.1007/978-90-481-8685-3_8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dark Energy: Investigation and Modeling

Abstract: Constantly accumulating observational data continue to confirm that about 70 % of the energy density today consists of dark energy responsible for the accelerated expansion of the Universe. We present recent observational bounds on dark energy constrained by the type Ia supernovae, cosmic microwave background, and baryon acoustic oscillations. We review a number of theoretical approaches that have been adopted so far to explain the origin of dark energy. This includes the cosmological constant, modified matter… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
104
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(104 citation statements)
references
References 646 publications
(859 reference statements)
0
104
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This test was performed mainly using Supernovae, but also using Baryonic Acoustic Oscillations and the CMB so as to fix the background history of the Universe [162, 217, 221, 286, 391, 23, 405, 481, 304, 382, 462]. Current observations seem to slightly disfavor the additional term in the Friedmann equation of DGP, even in the normal branch where the late-time acceleration of the Universe is due to a cosmological constant as in ΛCDM.…”
Section: The Dvali-gabadadze-porrati Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This test was performed mainly using Supernovae, but also using Baryonic Acoustic Oscillations and the CMB so as to fix the background history of the Universe [162, 217, 221, 286, 391, 23, 405, 481, 304, 382, 462]. Current observations seem to slightly disfavor the additional term in the Friedmann equation of DGP, even in the normal branch where the late-time acceleration of the Universe is due to a cosmological constant as in ΛCDM.…”
Section: The Dvali-gabadadze-porrati Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ΛCDM model shows an excellent guidance with current data [35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44] but it is severely plagued by the coincidence and fine tuning problems [45,46]. These issues do not enable concluding that the ΛCDM model represents the final paradigm to describe the universe dynamics (in particular, the measures of cosmological constant and matter magnitudes are extremely close to each other, i.e., Ω Λ /Ω ∼ 2.7, at our time [38,[47][48][49], whereas the predicted and observed cosmological constant values differ for about 123 orders of magnitude [50]). As a natural consequence, a wide amount of cosmological models has been introduced to extend the concordance model in 2 Advances in High Energy Physics order to get possible alternatives to dark energy derived from prime principles (see, e.g., [51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59] and references therein).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…On the other hand, we have considered that the different components are conserved separately, therefore by replacing Equation (5) …”
Section: The Model and The Lsbr Induced Abrupt Eventmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The exponentials have an imaginary argument, so the solutions are bounded and the DeWitt boundary condition is satisfied 5 . In the case of a positive value of E k , the solutions of the gravitational part read…”
Section: Wdw Equation With a Scalar Fieldmentioning
confidence: 99%