2019
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.8b20981
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dark Current Reduction Strategy via a Layer-By-Layer Solution Process for a High-Performance All-Polymer Photodetector

Abstract: The ideal bulk-heterojunction for high-performance organic photodetectors prefers a morphology with a vertically gradient component to suppress the leaking current. Here, we demonstrate an all-polymer photodetector with a segregated bulk-heterojunction active layer. This all-polymer photodetector exhibits a dramatically reduced dark current density because of its built-in charge blocking layer, with a responsivity of 0.25 A W–1 at a wavelength of approximately 600 nm and specific detectivity of 5.68 × 1012 cm … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
75
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
75
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, it is not reasonable to utilize Equation (1) for estimating D*. Besides, we observed similar behavior of polymer photodetectors in other works, [51,55] implying that the equation for D* should be used as following [51,[53][54][55]…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, it is not reasonable to utilize Equation (1) for estimating D*. Besides, we observed similar behavior of polymer photodetectors in other works, [51,55] implying that the equation for D* should be used as following [51,[53][54][55]…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Specific detectivity, D*, of a photodetector determines its ability to detect the weakest photosignal under various noises such as shot, Johnson (thermal), and flicker (1/f). [12,19,22,[49][50][51][52][53][54] D* is a crucial figure of merit for photodetectors, which is usually expressed in the simple equation by [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18]21,22,38,52,54,55]…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This could be true when dark current is high (cases under reverse bias). Due to the difficulty of measuring the real noise, only quite a few papers24,31–34 have measured rather than estimated the noise. In these measurements, the noise was in fact far beyond shot noise limit and showing domination of 1/ f n noise ( n ≥ 1), which decreases dramatically with increasing frequency but sometimes can still be higher than shot noise even at 1 kHz.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…not universally adopted, but instead many reports estimate D* based on only the shot noise and/or the thermal noise. [67] This simplification may lead to significant overestimation of the actual detectivity, [65,68] and makes it difficult to compare the performance of devices reported by different research groups.…”
Section: Noise Equivalent Power (Nep) and Specific Detectivity (D*)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, Zhong et al reduced the dark (noise) current by using a layerbylayer (LBL) solution processing method. [68] As opposed to the conventional onestep solution method, where the donor and acceptor are processed from the same solution, the LBL approach first deposits the donor before processing the acceptor layer (Figure 3f-h). Although this is similar to how conventional planar heterojunction are made, in this case the donor and acceptor layers are not completely separated but instead they are able to partially mix in order to form BHJ mor phology while maintaining vertical segregation.…”
Section: Dark and Noise Current Reductionmentioning
confidence: 99%