2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.bjid.2019.05.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Daptomycin to bone and joint infections and prosthesis joint infections: a systematic review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The low efficacy of vancomycin against staphylococcal biofilms could be due to a reduced biofilm penetration, a reduced concentration of free vancomycin being sequestrated by S. aureus on peptidoglycan layers, or a stimulation of biofilm formation by low concentrations of vancomycin (Broussou et al, 2018). Conversely, daptomycin has shown a superior efficacy against bone and joint infections caused by MRSA (Chang et al, 2017;Telles et al, 2019). The consistent synergistic effect observed with Sb-1/daptomycin combination against all tested rifampin-resistant MRSA strains in our study, together with the good biofilm penetration properties (Ozturk et al, 2016) and in vitro activity against stationary-phase bacteria inside the biofilm (Smith et al, 2009), makes daptomycin a promising candidate for combinatorial therapy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The low efficacy of vancomycin against staphylococcal biofilms could be due to a reduced biofilm penetration, a reduced concentration of free vancomycin being sequestrated by S. aureus on peptidoglycan layers, or a stimulation of biofilm formation by low concentrations of vancomycin (Broussou et al, 2018). Conversely, daptomycin has shown a superior efficacy against bone and joint infections caused by MRSA (Chang et al, 2017;Telles et al, 2019). The consistent synergistic effect observed with Sb-1/daptomycin combination against all tested rifampin-resistant MRSA strains in our study, together with the good biofilm penetration properties (Ozturk et al, 2016) and in vitro activity against stationary-phase bacteria inside the biofilm (Smith et al, 2009), makes daptomycin a promising candidate for combinatorial therapy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 10 Vancomycin and teicoplanin are highly effective in treatment of serious MRSA infections; however, the suboptimal response often necessitates the addition of a second or third antimicrobial agent, such as rifampicin and aminoglycosides. 11 , 12 Reasonable empirical antibiotic treatments in limb-threatening infections include a combination of an anti-anaerobic agent like clindamycin and an anti-aerobic antibiotic. 13 Over the past few years, new cephalosporins with improved activity against Staphylococcus aureus have been discovered; however, their antimicrobial activities are insufficient to eradicate MRSA infection, 14 except for the fourth generation parenteral cephalosporin, which has shown good antibacterial activity against MRSA.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Next, we evaluated the effect of the combination of tedizolid-rifampicin on 48-h-old MSSA and MRSA biofilms. The combination daptomycin-rifampicin has been included as a positive control according to previous data supporting the efficacy in biofilm-related infections ( LaPlante and Woodmansee, 2009 ; Hall Snyder et al, 2015 ; Telles et al, 2019 ; Kamble and Pardesi, 2020 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%