2016
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btw580
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DAPAR & ProStaR: software to perform statistical analyses in quantitative discovery proteomics

Abstract: SummaryDAPAR and ProStaR are software tools to perform the statistical analysis of label-free XIC-based quantitative discovery proteomics experiments. DAPAR contains procedures to filter, normalize, impute missing value, aggregate peptide intensities, perform null hypothesis significance tests and select the most likely differentially abundant proteins with a corresponding false discovery rate. ProStaR is a graphical user interface that allows friendly access to the DAPAR functionalities through a web browser.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
215
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 278 publications
(230 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
215
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Peptides and proteins were identified and quantified using MaxQuant (version 1.5.7.4 [28]) and Uniprot database (February 2017 version, Escherichia coli K-12 taxonomy). For statistical analysis, we used ProStaR (29). Proteins identified in the reverse and contaminant databases and proteins exhibiting less than 4 intensity values in one condition were discarded from the list.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Peptides and proteins were identified and quantified using MaxQuant (version 1.5.7.4 [28]) and Uniprot database (February 2017 version, Escherichia coli K-12 taxonomy). For statistical analysis, we used ProStaR (29). Proteins identified in the reverse and contaminant databases and proteins exhibiting less than 4 intensity values in one condition were discarded from the list.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…batch effects or missing values (see for instance Wieczorek and others (2016)), methods for differential analysis of proteomic datasets can be divided in two main families: peptide-based and aggregation-based methods, also referred to as summarization-based in Goeminne and others (2015). In the latter ones, peptide-level information is first aggregated at the protein level and proteins are then tested for differential abundance using these summaries.…”
Section: State-of-the-artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although several comprehensive analysis pipelines, such as OCAP (Wang, Yang & Yang, 2012), ProSightPC (http://proteinaceous.net/software/), TopPIC (Kou, Xun & Liu, 2016), MSstats (Choi et al, 2014), Skyline (MacLean et al, 2010), MaxQuant & Perseus (Tyanova et al, 2016) and DAPAR & ProStaR (Wieczorek et al, 2017), have been developed for the downstream data analysis, to the best of our knowledge there are no tools specifically designed to facilitate chemoproteomics data analysis for scientists with a limited computational background and available as a public server application.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%