2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.bica.2016.07.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DANNA: A neuromorphic software ecosystem

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
10
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In AER communication, each neuron has a unique address, and when a spike is generated that will traverse between chips, the address specifies to which chip it will go. Custom PCI Example neuromorphic visualization tools, giving a high-level view of a spiking neural network model [2341] and a low-level view of a network layout on a particular neuromorphic implementation [2342].…”
Section: A Communicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In AER communication, each neuron has a unique address, and when a spike is generated that will traverse between chips, the address specifies to which chip it will go. Custom PCI Example neuromorphic visualization tools, giving a high-level view of a spiking neural network model [2341] and a low-level view of a network layout on a particular neuromorphic implementation [2342].…”
Section: A Communicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many well-known deep learning models, such as VGGNet [37], GoogLeNet [38], and Microsoft ResNet [39], have achieved excellent results in international classification recognition competitions, and they offer many ways to solve problems. In this study, we compare the proposed 2-CLSTM Model with VGGNet, GoogLeNet, and ResNet50 using the same input data set and Adam [40] optimizer. VGGNet's structure is simple, and it bears a lot of similarities to the traditional CNN model.…”
Section: E Baseline Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of the primary difficulties include: (1) Neuromorphic chips are a niche product and difficult to procure at volume; (2) There is insufficient software interfaces for developing applications; (3) Many algorithms are incompatible or may underperform on neuromorphic hardware; (4) Large-scale applications are often too large; (5) Cross-compiling code and I/O require considerable time and bandwidth from a host machine. See Diamond et al (2016), Severa et al (2019), Hunsberger and Eliasmith (2016), Disney et al (2016), Davison et al (2009), Ehsan et al (2017), and Wolfe et al (2018) for more details and possible approaches toward solving these challenges. Moreover, some of the themes from the Existence proof, human brains as efficient energy consumers section (e.g., minimizing wiring, keeping firing rates constant, using sparse and reduced representations) could be incorporated into neuromorphic designs.…”
Section: Current State Of Ai As It Pertains To Energy Consumptionmentioning
confidence: 99%