2016
DOI: 10.2147/clep.s99469
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Danish Registry of Childhood and Adolescent Diabetes

Abstract: AimThe aims of the Danish Registry of Childhood and Adolescent Diabetes (DanDiabKids) are to monitor and improve the quality of care for children and adolescents with diabetes in Denmark and to follow the incidence and prevalence of diabetes.Study populationThe study population consists of all children diagnosed with diabetes before the age of 15 years since 1996. Since 2015, every child followed up at a pediatric center (<18 years of age) will be included.Main variablesThe variables in the registry are the qu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
55
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
55
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the event of duplicate studies, only one was considered. Some studies investigated independent factors on the same large cohort and so have been included in the selection: the Danish registry of childhood and adolescent diabetes (DanDiabKids); the Diabetes‐Patienten‐Verlaufsdokumentation or diabetes‐patient‐documentation (DPV Germany‐Austria); the T1D exchange clinic network (T1DX); the Swedish childhood diabetes registry (SweDiabKids) As no review exists on the genetic factors of HbA1c in T1D patients and due to the low number of studies, a similar search strategy was used, with the additional following inclusion/exclusion criteria: (1) the term “genetic” listed in the key words; (2) no date limit for publications; and (3) a less restrictive age limit (childhood and early adulthood).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the event of duplicate studies, only one was considered. Some studies investigated independent factors on the same large cohort and so have been included in the selection: the Danish registry of childhood and adolescent diabetes (DanDiabKids); the Diabetes‐Patienten‐Verlaufsdokumentation or diabetes‐patient‐documentation (DPV Germany‐Austria); the T1D exchange clinic network (T1DX); the Swedish childhood diabetes registry (SweDiabKids) As no review exists on the genetic factors of HbA1c in T1D patients and due to the low number of studies, a similar search strategy was used, with the additional following inclusion/exclusion criteria: (1) the term “genetic” listed in the key words; (2) no date limit for publications; and (3) a less restrictive age limit (childhood and early adulthood).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Anonymized data from six large registries/ audits of children with T1D were used, representing eight countries: Germany and Austria from the Prospective Diabetes Follow-up Registry (DPV) (16), England and Wales from the National Pediatric Diabetes Audit (NPDA) (17), U.S. from the T1D Exchange (T1DX) (18), Sweden from the Swedish Pediatric Diabetes Quality Registry(SWEDIABKIDS) (8),Denmark from the Danish National Diabetes Registry (DanDiabKids) (19), and Norway from the Norwegian Childhood Diabetes Registry (NCDR) (20). All data sources were population-based registries or audits covering .80% of the national population of children with T1D, except for T1DX, which was a clinic-based registry (Table 1).…”
Section: Study Design and Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Worldwide the increase of diabetes in children and adolescents is mainly due to an increase in the number of patients with type 2 diabetes [4,16,17]. The present analysis revealed a small increase in the number of patients with type 2 diabetes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 39%
“…The prevalence of diabetes in children and adolescents is increasing worldwide [5,16,17]. Rehabilitation strategies aim to optimize the quality of diabetes control, improve patients' ability for diabetes self-management and to increase understanding of acute and long-term complications.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%