Danger signs of neonatal illnesses: perceptions of caregivers and health workers in northern India

Abstract

Objective To assess household practices that can affect neonatal health, from the perspective of caregivers and health workers; to identify signs in neonates leading either to recognition of illness or health-care seeking; and to ascertain the proportion of caregivers who recognize the individual items of the integrated management of neonatal and childhood illnesses (IMNCI) programme. Methods The study was carried out in a rural community in Sarojininagar Block, Uttar Pradesh, India, using qualitative and quantitative research designs. Study participants were mothers, grandmothers, grandfathers, fathers or "nannies" (other female relatives) caring for infants younger than 6 months of age and recognized health-care providers serving the area. Focus group discussions (n = 7), key informant interviews (n = 35) and structured interviews (n = 210) were conducted with these participants. Findings Many household practices were observed which could adversely affect maternal and neonatal health. Among 200 caregivers, 70.5% reported home deliveries conducted by local untrained nurses or relatives, and most mothers initiated breastfeeding only on day 3. More than half of the caregivers recognized fever, irritability, weakness, abdominal distension/vomiting, slow breathing and diarrhoea as danger signs in neonates. Seventy-nine (39.5%) of the caregivers had seen a sick neonate in the family in the past 2 years, with 30.38% in whom illness manifested as continuous crying. Health care was sought for 46 (23%) neonates. Traditional medicines were used for treatment of bulging fontanelle, chest in-drawing and rapid breathing. Conclusion Because there is no universal recognition of danger signs in neonates, and potentially harmful antenatal and birthing practices are followed, there is a need to give priority to implementing IMNCI, and possible incorporation of continuous crying as an additional danger sign.

Knowledge of Government and Private Primary Health Care Workers on Newborn Care Components: A Questionnaire-Based Cross-Sectional Comparative Study

“…The study done in urban area of New Delhi found that bad child rearing practices were followed in that part of the country [10]. In accordance with the present study finding that the health-care workers lack knowledge on danger signs of newborn, a study done by Awasthi et al in North India, identified that health-care providers could recognize some, but not all, the danger signs in pregnancy as well as in the neonate [14]. If the mothers are informed about the danger signs of the newborn, it will promote timely management of the illnesses and prevent neonatal mortality after home-based deliveries.…”

Knowledge, attitude and practices on the care of the newborn in postnatal mothers delivering at a tertiary care centre in Nepal

“…Majority of the mothers were unaware of the general danger signs of newborn; over 50% of the mothers just considered fever, vomiting and jaundice as sign of sickness. Fever and excessive crying was considered to be a general danger sign in a similar study 4 . Majority of care givers in African countries also do not know about signs and symptoms of sepsis, its causes and management 5,6 .…”

Infant illness spanning the antenatal to early neonatal continuum in rural northern Ghana: local perceptions, beliefs and practices

“…11,[33][34][35] Although respondents in this study recognized illness symptoms, their interpretations of the illnesses, hence, the respondent practices varied considerably. This observation provides an opportunity for local health authorities, researchers and programmers to understand and devise culturally and socially-sensitive educational interventions aimed at reducing perinatal morbidity and mortality.…”