2002
DOI: 10.1201/9781420042443.ch26
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dams and Appurtenant Facilities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where RF population is the downstream human population at risk, RF property is the property risk factor and depends on the value of private, commercial, industrial, or governmental property in the potential flood path. 60 Those information can be obtained from detailed breach Since 1850, there have been 63 known dam failure in the United States (exclusive of tailings dams) that have involved fatalities (Figure 5). 63 It corresponds to the frequency of occurrence of 0.38 per year of dam failure.…”
Section: Semi-quantitative Seismic Ranking Of Dam Portfoliomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where RF population is the downstream human population at risk, RF property is the property risk factor and depends on the value of private, commercial, industrial, or governmental property in the potential flood path. 60 Those information can be obtained from detailed breach Since 1850, there have been 63 known dam failure in the United States (exclusive of tailings dams) that have involved fatalities (Figure 5). 63 It corresponds to the frequency of occurrence of 0.38 per year of dam failure.…”
Section: Semi-quantitative Seismic Ranking Of Dam Portfoliomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is an easy manner to evaluate earthquake hazard via way of means of figuring out the hazard class. ICOLD introduces that the whole risk of dams includes structural and socio-monetary factors [33]. The first is especially based upon at dam height and ability of the reservoir.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this section, we modify a seismic risk ranking method (Bureau et al 2003) to analyse the anti-seismic capability and improve public awareness of potential seismic hazards. A more detailed description is presented throughout the following subsections.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ESI = PGA × (M − 4.5) 3 . The corresponding standardized values for the above-mentioned parameters could be achieved from Bureau (2003), listed in Tables 2 and 3.…”
Section: Seismic Risk Ranking For Large Damsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation