2017
DOI: 10.1209/0295-5075/117/57008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Damping in a superconducting mechanical resonator

Abstract: PACS 74.25.Ld -Superconductivity , Mechanical and acoustical properties, elasticity, and ultrasonic attenuation PACS 46.40.-f -vibrations and mechanical wavesAbstract -We study a mechanical resonator made of aluminum near the normal to super conductivity phase transition. A sharp drop in the rate of mechanical damping is observed below the critical temperature. The experimental results are compared with predictions based on the Bardeen Cooper Schrieffer theory of superconductivity and a fair agreement is obtai… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
(51 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The fitted interaction energy is rather high (one would expect it more around 1 eV), but may likely reflect a non-uniform distribution of the TLS inside the beam [22], which is out of the scope of this study. Note that our expression does not fit the data in the superconducting state between 600 mK and 1 K, which we attribute to the substantial density of quasiparticle excitations in this range, that should contribute to an excess damping through the same mechanism as electrons in the normal state [33]: in fact, above 800 mK the data in both states are identical within experimental accuracy, as observed previously [23]. This shall be addressed elsewhere.…”
mentioning
confidence: 56%
“…The fitted interaction energy is rather high (one would expect it more around 1 eV), but may likely reflect a non-uniform distribution of the TLS inside the beam [22], which is out of the scope of this study. Note that our expression does not fit the data in the superconducting state between 600 mK and 1 K, which we attribute to the substantial density of quasiparticle excitations in this range, that should contribute to an excess damping through the same mechanism as electrons in the normal state [33]: in fact, above 800 mK the data in both states are identical within experimental accuracy, as observed previously [23]. This shall be addressed elsewhere.…”
mentioning
confidence: 56%
“…The fitted interaction energy is rather high (one would expect it more around 1 eV), but may likely reflect a nonuniform distribution of the TLS inside the beam [22], which is out of the scope of this study. Note that our expression does not fit the data in the superconducting state between 600 mK and 1 K, which we attribute to the substantial density of quasiparticle excitations in this range, that should contribute to an excess damping through the same mechanism as electrons in the normal state [37]: in fact, above 800 mK the data in both states are identical within experimental accuracy, as observed previously [23]. This shall be addressed elsewhere.…”
Section: Interpretation In the Superconducting Statementioning
confidence: 56%
“…In addition to the temperature-independent magnetomotive damping, the wide devices demonstrated another temperatureindependent contribution to the damping f c (tabulated in Table I), observed as a finite value of the damping when the normal-state data was extrapolated to zero temperature and zero magnetic field. This temperature-independent contribution could result, for instance, from support losses [46] or electron contributions [47] to the damping.…”
Section: S Nmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[43], but is in contrast to Refs. [24,30,47], where aluminum is deposited on silicon or silicon nitride. 035409-7 FIG.…”
Section: S Nmentioning
confidence: 99%