2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2004.10.033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Damping efficiency of the coating structure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
38
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This kind of interface slippage mechanism can enhance vibrational friction energy loss due to having larger boundary contact area and many interfaces in the columnar structures [71]. However, the boundary damping between the coating and substrate, observed by Yu et al [72], is not observed in this work. One reason could be that the force level exerted on the specimen by the shaker is small and such nonlinear damping mechanism is not excited.…”
Section: Mechanical Damping Lossfactor Resultsmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…This kind of interface slippage mechanism can enhance vibrational friction energy loss due to having larger boundary contact area and many interfaces in the columnar structures [71]. However, the boundary damping between the coating and substrate, observed by Yu et al [72], is not observed in this work. One reason could be that the force level exerted on the specimen by the shaker is small and such nonlinear damping mechanism is not excited.…”
Section: Mechanical Damping Lossfactor Resultsmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…It is shown that the damping behaviour exhibits little change with respect to the one obtained from the uncoated specimen (Example 5.1), making this specific solution not effective. As a matter of fact, the constrained layer damping (CLD) contribution [1,9], exhibited when the material shear modulus of two close layer coatings is highly different, is low in this example case. To increase the CLD contribution, in Example 5.1.2 a different, stiffer material was adopted in layers k = 2, 4, letting all of the remaining parameters unchanged with respect to previous Example 5.1.1.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…In all of these works, it was found that the deposition of thin coatings can improve the damping behaviour of the composite system. Moreover, it was experimentally found in [6][7][8][9][10] that the dissipative actions in multi-layer architectures can be assumed as localized at the interfaces of the layers. Kinematical parameters are the axial ũ and transversal beam w  displacement components, kx,z is the stiffness of the longitudinal and transversal distributed elastic constraints, cx,z is the viscosity of the longitudinal and transversal distributed viscous constraints, q and Fw are the distributed and concentrated external transversal loads, ρk, Ek, and Gk are the material, k-th layer, mass density, axial and shear moduli, and t is the time coordinate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the application of Ni and Cu coatings on stainless steel 10Cr18Ni9Ti considerably increases damping compared to electrolytic, gas-flame and other coatings. The damping properties of stainless steel 10Cr18Ni9 with plasma coatings based on NiCrAlY, Al 2 O 3 and FeCr as well as nanopowder ZrO 2 are described in studies [15,20]. The research reveals that relaxation effects along the grain boundaries affect the change in the damping properties of the system as well as the ability of a nanostructure to enhance the mechanical properties of composite materials.…”
Section: Literature Review and Problem Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%