2013
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0057841
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dampening Enthusiasm for Circulating MicroRNA in Breast Cancer

Abstract: Genome-wide platforms for high-throughput profiling of circulating miRNA (oligoarray or miR-Seq) offer enormous promise for agnostic discovery of circulating miRNA biomarkers as a pathway for development in breast cancer detection. By harmonizing data from 15 previous reports, we found widespread inconsistencies across prior studies. Whether this arises from differences in study design, such as sample source or profiling platform, is unclear. As a reproducibility experiment, we generated a genome-wide plasma m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
102
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 105 publications
(103 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
102
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although several groups have been focused on studying the expression levels of circulating miRNAs in plasma, it is remarkable that limited overlap has been observed between the findings of even very similar studies of the same disease. Regarding breast cancer, as Thompson et al mentioned, there is a dampening enthusiasm for circulating miRNAs because after the analysis of 15 reports on circulating miRNAs in breast cancer patients revealed a very low reproducibility between the datasets published previously (45 ). The lack of reproducibility may have several reasons: (a) sample type (plasma, serum, whole blood), (b) differences in blood processing protocols, (c) differences in study populations, (d) differences in time points of sample collections (46 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although several groups have been focused on studying the expression levels of circulating miRNAs in plasma, it is remarkable that limited overlap has been observed between the findings of even very similar studies of the same disease. Regarding breast cancer, as Thompson et al mentioned, there is a dampening enthusiasm for circulating miRNAs because after the analysis of 15 reports on circulating miRNAs in breast cancer patients revealed a very low reproducibility between the datasets published previously (45 ). The lack of reproducibility may have several reasons: (a) sample type (plasma, serum, whole blood), (b) differences in blood processing protocols, (c) differences in study populations, (d) differences in time points of sample collections (46 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There was no overlap of significantly differentially expressed miRNAs between the Leidner et al data set and others. The authors noted that consistently discordant results outnumbered concordant results, justifying what they called "dampening enthusiasm" in their article title (27 ). Unfortunately, the more recent findings have not helped to build consensus.…”
Section: Breast Cancer Studies: Widespread Lack Of Reproducibility Pementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In some studies, these potential markers may have been overlooked. Interestingly, Leidner et al discarded common blood miRNAs before analysis, effectively focusing on just these rare miRNAs (27 ). The possibility of reanalysis and discovery is another argument for public availability of raw and normalized data.…”
Section: Possible Exception: Normally Silenced Mirnasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Little is understood about the early dynamics and release of circulating miRNAs under specific disease conditions. Importantly, circulating miRNA signatures have been challenging to confirm in separate cohorts, raising questions as to whether consistent changes in circulating miRNAs occur (9,10).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%