2014
DOI: 10.18352/ulr.286
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Damages in Wrongful Death Cases in the Light of European Human Rights Law: Towards a Rights-Based Approach to the Law of Damages

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 5 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Among the most significant changes in the opinions of scholars and approaches of national legal science of different countries to the determination of the grounds for compensation for moral damage caused in the field of healthcare, is the gradual convergence of the two complementary vectors of legal regulation. On the one hand, this refers to focus on the award of appropriate compensation in connection with the actual physical or mental losses, which is traditional for tort law, and on the other hand, this also refers to an increasingly noticeable tendency, which occurred due to the implicit reception of the positions of the European Court of Human Rights, to also ensure the protection of the general human right (for example, in case of violation of the patient's right to provide effective informed consent to medical intervention) (Rijnhout and Emaus 2014). It should be recognised that the development of this approach opens up very broad prospects for providing compensatory protection to a much larger number of patients, their family members, and close relatives.…”
Section: Common Principles Of Legal Regulation In American and European Legislationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the most significant changes in the opinions of scholars and approaches of national legal science of different countries to the determination of the grounds for compensation for moral damage caused in the field of healthcare, is the gradual convergence of the two complementary vectors of legal regulation. On the one hand, this refers to focus on the award of appropriate compensation in connection with the actual physical or mental losses, which is traditional for tort law, and on the other hand, this also refers to an increasingly noticeable tendency, which occurred due to the implicit reception of the positions of the European Court of Human Rights, to also ensure the protection of the general human right (for example, in case of violation of the patient's right to provide effective informed consent to medical intervention) (Rijnhout and Emaus 2014). It should be recognised that the development of this approach opens up very broad prospects for providing compensatory protection to a much larger number of patients, their family members, and close relatives.…”
Section: Common Principles Of Legal Regulation In American and European Legislationmentioning
confidence: 99%