2022
DOI: 10.1007/s10518-022-01396-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Damage tracking and evaluation of RC columns with structural performances by using seismic monitoring data

Abstract: A methodology of data-driven damage state quantification with a probability estimation for structural hysteresis of RC columns is presented in this paper. The knowledge learned from a large-volume structural behavior database is fully considered for developing monitoringoriented damage indicators, with the established relationship between data-driven damage prediction and physics-based damage state evaluation. In the present study, a database of the hysteresis behavior of 1015 RC columns with different design … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Definition of damage states or criteria for damage classification and the corresponding limiting values of ERPs is an important requirement for seismic design, evaluation of existing structures, and seismic health monitoring (Shan et al, 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Definition of damage states or criteria for damage classification and the corresponding limiting values of ERPs is an important requirement for seismic design, evaluation of existing structures, and seismic health monitoring (Shan et al, 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Concrete02 material is utilized to simulate the uniaxial behavior of the concrete based on the Kent–Park constitutive model, while Steel02 is used to model the steel reinforcement based on the Menegotto–Pinto model. Detailed description of the modeling has been presented in Shan et al 37 The so‐called synthetic database in this paper consists of the simulated hysteretic restoring force curves of 1015 RC columns with five controlling design parameters: the axial load ratio, stirrup reinforcement ratio, reinforcement ratio, stirrup strength, and depth–width ratio, which are denoted as A, B, C, D, and E, respectively, in sequence. The data of these hysteretic curves obtained by OpenSEES and the information of the RC columns are summarized in Table 1.…”
Section: Database Of Structural Hysteresis Behaviorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Te associated structural damage is evaluated and further exploited for damage state classifcation. In this work, the previous design framework of the structural damage evaluation and seismic performance assessment is extended to consider uncertainty [43]. Te specifc steps to the proposed framework are outlined as follows:…”
Section: Design Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%