2013
DOI: 10.2208/journalofjsce.1.1_398
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Damage to Road Bridges Induced by Ground Motion in the 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Various research projects were simultaneously conducted to improve the ductility capacity of RC piers using ultrahigh‐strength confined concrete, ductile interlocking spiral ties, encased steel in RC piers, and fiber‐reinforced plastic hinge zones . After the 2011 Great East Japan earthquake, the seismic design of new bridges revealed an effective improvement of the design methodology; brittle failures were not observed, and enhanced ductile piers performed well according to the capacity design concept …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Various research projects were simultaneously conducted to improve the ductility capacity of RC piers using ultrahigh‐strength confined concrete, ductile interlocking spiral ties, encased steel in RC piers, and fiber‐reinforced plastic hinge zones . After the 2011 Great East Japan earthquake, the seismic design of new bridges revealed an effective improvement of the design methodology; brittle failures were not observed, and enhanced ductile piers performed well according to the capacity design concept …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9 After the 2011 Great East Japan earthquake, the seismic design of new bridges revealed an effective improvement of the design methodology; brittle failures were not observed, and enhanced ductile piers performed well according to the capacity design concept. 10,11 Currently, much of the technology has already been developed to satisfy the capacity design procedure, in which a hierarchy of the resistances of structural members is established to dissipate seismic force at suitable plastic deformations without an excessive loss of strength. 12 However, despite the good ductile performance of structures during recent strong earthquakes, bridges have endured significant damage and undesirable residual displacements through sacrificial components, 13,14 indicating that their seismic resilience has not been adequately ensured.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15. The possible reason, in scenario 2 and 3, the middle structure remained elastic behavior, more ever in scenario 4 all structure columns still performed the elastic behavior. Hence, the structure that behaves elastically could have a better re-centering ability.…”
Section: (2) Structural Seismic Performancementioning
confidence: 96%
“…However, the Level 2 of ground motion input is a large seismic coefficient demand. Furthermore, based on the observation damaged bridge 4) after the Great East Japan earthquake in 2011, there were some rupture occurrences of rubber bearing supports even though it were designed following the post-1995 design specifications. Probably, it might be caused by the deterioration due to the aging 5), 6) , the (a) (b) (c) Fig.1 The illustration of; (a) conventional pier under earthquake, (b) lost seismic performance of deteriorated rubber bearing 4) , and (c) compressive cyclic fatigue curve of rubber bearing 8) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Altın et al [11] carried out dynamic analysis of suspension bridges and full-scale testing in which the effects of large deflections are taken into account. Takahashi and Hoshikuma [12] explored the damages of road bridges induced by the ground motion in the 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake and summarized the characteristics of damage to road bridges induced by the ground motion. Cahya et al [13] also investigated seismic response behavior using static pushover analysis and dynamic analysis of half-through steel arch bridge under strong earthquake.…”
Section: Seismic Response Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%