2016
DOI: 10.3390/safety2010004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Damage Survivability of Passenger Ships—Re-Engineering the Safety Factor

Abstract: This paper presents a brief summary of the work carried out by SSRC and Brookes Bell Safety at Sea within the EC-funded project GOALDS on the development of a new formulation for assessing the survivability of damaged ships in waves. The proposed formula is meant to be an alternative or replacement to the s-factor in use within the current SOLAS regulations for probabilistic damage stability. The authors briefly discuss concerns related to the current survivability model and present the process of development … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A distribution P(Hs) can then be derived, following multiple repetitions of tests, [9]. Depending on the definition, the critical sea state can be regarded as a wave height at which P(Hs) = 0.5 or, alternatively, as the highest sea state with a low probability of capsize (e.g., P(Hs) < 0.05), as proposed in GOALDS [12] and more in-line with the notion of limiting wave height, as explained in [14].…”
Section: Critical Significant Wave Heightmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A distribution P(Hs) can then be derived, following multiple repetitions of tests, [9]. Depending on the definition, the critical sea state can be regarded as a wave height at which P(Hs) = 0.5 or, alternatively, as the highest sea state with a low probability of capsize (e.g., P(Hs) < 0.05), as proposed in GOALDS [12] and more in-line with the notion of limiting wave height, as explained in [14].…”
Section: Critical Significant Wave Heightmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As part of this project, 20 RoPax damages and 2 cruise ships were subjected to parametric investigation numerically, [14], for the establishment of survivability, whereas experiments in modern water basins were conducted on two RoPax and two cruise ships, respectively, for verification purposes in collision damages. For this, worst SOLAS 2compartment damage were used ±35%L amidships, whilst, for the case of cruise ships, which exhibited high resistance to capsize, 3-compartment damages were used for the derivation of the survivability boundary, [14].…”
Section: Goalds Projectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The outcomes of two of these projects are shown in Figures 4 and 5. Another outcome relates to alternative s-factor formulations accounting for the reconfiguration of the internal ship space, even above the strength deck, a real novelty, which for the first time was taken further in Project GOALDS [53,54].…”
Section: Ropax Vs Cruise Ships: Hitting a "Wall"mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, the A-index can provide a very conservative measure of survivability. Alternative s-factor formulations have been presented by Papanikolaou et al (2013) and Cichowicz et al (2016). Still the SOLAS formulae are widely used.…”
Section: Concept Of Survivabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%