One of the key recent advances in our understanding of urothelial carcinoma of the bladder has been the identification of molecular subtypes based primarily on RNA expression. A five-category taxonomy was reported first in 2012, which was followed by three separate classification systems described in early 2014 that established bladder cancer subtyping as critical to further molecular characterization of bladder cancer, and as potentially clinically relevant for novel therapeutics and biomarker development.There are significant commonalities between all of the bladder cancer subtyping systems. In general terms, they all divide tumors into luminal and basal subtypes, as has been long established in breast cancer. Each classification system differentiates additional subtypes within luminal and basal tumors. Key molecular underpinnings for each subtype have been described, and these provide a framework for further delineation of the molecular mechanisms that are critical to bladder cancer development and progression. Immunologic features play a central role in the subtyping, and immune markers alone can be used to recapitulate the molecular classification.The clinical implications of molecular subtyping of bladder cancer pertain to prognostication and prediction of response to therapy. Choi et al. (Cancer Cell, 25, 152-165, 2014) were the first to identify that the subtypes predicted survival independent of therapy and also predicted response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. We developed a single patient classifier that demonstrated that patients with basal tumors had the greatest benefit from neoadjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Further validation is however required before this can be used in clinical practice. Two groups have reported disparate results linking subtypes to response to immunotherapy in the metastatic setting, and more work is also required in this domain.
abs#2
CATCHING-UP: OPPORTUNITIES AND CHALLENGES FOR KIDNEY CANCER BIOMARKERS TO ENABLE TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH
Craig Gedye 1 1 Calvary Mater Newcastle, Waratah, NSW, AustraliaPrecision medicine to individualize cancer management options depends on discriminatory biomarkers to inform patients and their clinicians. Beyond histology and clinical biomarkers, these are largely lacking in kidney cancer. Despite these challenges, kidney cancer is catching up to other cancers with an evolving array of biomarkers including clinical, proteomic and nucleic acid based predictors. This review will briefly summarise biomarkers in routine use, but focus on developing assays that have the potential to illuminate myriad clinical situations in the management of kidney cancer that will benefit from predictive and/or prognostic discriminators. We will particularly focus on predictors of immunotherapy benefit and resistance, and strategies to improve targeted therapy by use of clinical biomarkers. (1), and certain biomarkers may be characteristic as kidney progresses from a pre-malignant to malignant state. We assess magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) as a pre-...