“…Progressive damage models are different from residual stiffness/strength models in the sense that they choose a damage variable based on the actual damage mechanism of the composite such as matrix crack, interface failure, fiber fracture, or delaminations; however, similar to the second group, the focus of these models is the study of the damage growth rather than the prediction of the life of the specimen. Examples of this class of models can be found in Bergmann and Prinz, 24 Ogin et al, 25 Carswell, 26 and Spearing and Beaumont. 27,28 In addition to the above-mentioned limitations of each of the aforementioned three groups of fatigue models, most of the existing models in the literature heavily depend on experimental parameters which thus makes them too specific and usually applicable to one particular class of Polymer Matrix Composites (PMC's), special type of loading and specific laminate configuration and geometry.…”