Abstract:Aerospace vehicles are demanded to withstand harsh conditions with a low weight impact. Composites have been increasingly adopted to meet such performances but they are affected by sudden and barely visible failures when subjected to low velocity impacts. The design criteria and the maintenance tasks in a damage tolerant approach are unavoidably compromised. Structural Health Monitoring is expected to avoid typical accommodations employed during design and lifetime management by achieving a cost-effective and … Show more
“…It resulted in many images obtained for the same structural state which were then fused to improve the damage localization. A multiparameter approach [25] was presented using the reconstruction algorithm which enhanced the damage localization of single detection framework by extracting different features from the propagating wave. Furthermore, there have been Lamb-wave-based baseline-free methods for damage imaging and localization in isotropic plates using wavelet transform, empirical mode decomposition [26], and instantaneous baseline measurement [27] methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In some methods, the feature measured in the second stage is different from the one measured in the first stage (e.g., location of the defect in the first stage and its size in the second stage). Most of the existing NDT methods for damage detection in plate-like structures only focus on identification of the damage position and not its extent/size [10,14,15,22,24,25,30,31,32,33,35,36,37]. The reason is that most of the existing methods detect the damage usually in the form of images, and do not provide accurate quantitative measurements.…”
A multistage damage detection method is introduced in this work that uses piezoelectric lead zirconate titanate (PZT) transducers to excite/sense the Lamb wave signals. A continuous wavelet transformation (CWT), based on the Gabor wavelet, is applied to accurately process the complicated wave signals caused by the damage. For a network of transducers, the damage can be detected in one detection cell based on the signals scattered by the damage, and then it can be quantitatively estimated by three detection stages using the outer tangent circle and least-squares methods. First, a single-stage damage detection method is carried out by exciting a transducer at the center of the detection cell to locate the damaged subcell. Then, the corner transducers are excited in the second and third stages of detection to improve the damage detection, especially the size estimation. The method does not require any baseline signal, and it only utilizes the same arrangement of transducers and the same data processing technique in all stages. The results from previous detection stages contribute to the improvement of damage detection in the subsequent stages. Both numerical simulation and experimental evaluation were used to verify that the method can accurately quantify the damage location and size. It was also found that the size of the detection cell plays a vital role in the accuracy of the results in this Lamb-wave-based multistage damage detection method.
“…It resulted in many images obtained for the same structural state which were then fused to improve the damage localization. A multiparameter approach [25] was presented using the reconstruction algorithm which enhanced the damage localization of single detection framework by extracting different features from the propagating wave. Furthermore, there have been Lamb-wave-based baseline-free methods for damage imaging and localization in isotropic plates using wavelet transform, empirical mode decomposition [26], and instantaneous baseline measurement [27] methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In some methods, the feature measured in the second stage is different from the one measured in the first stage (e.g., location of the defect in the first stage and its size in the second stage). Most of the existing NDT methods for damage detection in plate-like structures only focus on identification of the damage position and not its extent/size [10,14,15,22,24,25,30,31,32,33,35,36,37]. The reason is that most of the existing methods detect the damage usually in the form of images, and do not provide accurate quantitative measurements.…”
A multistage damage detection method is introduced in this work that uses piezoelectric lead zirconate titanate (PZT) transducers to excite/sense the Lamb wave signals. A continuous wavelet transformation (CWT), based on the Gabor wavelet, is applied to accurately process the complicated wave signals caused by the damage. For a network of transducers, the damage can be detected in one detection cell based on the signals scattered by the damage, and then it can be quantitatively estimated by three detection stages using the outer tangent circle and least-squares methods. First, a single-stage damage detection method is carried out by exciting a transducer at the center of the detection cell to locate the damaged subcell. Then, the corner transducers are excited in the second and third stages of detection to improve the damage detection, especially the size estimation. The method does not require any baseline signal, and it only utilizes the same arrangement of transducers and the same data processing technique in all stages. The results from previous detection stages contribute to the improvement of damage detection in the subsequent stages. Both numerical simulation and experimental evaluation were used to verify that the method can accurately quantify the damage location and size. It was also found that the size of the detection cell plays a vital role in the accuracy of the results in this Lamb-wave-based multistage damage detection method.
“…PC supported structure) was seen in the last example through improvement of 3DPP procedure, alongside least swagger and large scale pore size of 200 and 750 μm, separately . Tomographic features are a multiparameter investigation of ultrasonic information upgrades the limitation dependability utilizing a similar remaking calculation with information combination approach while looking with different damages changed sort of harms …”
Section: Tomography Features For Structural Engineering Applicationmentioning
Tomography imaging an object is by taking measurements from slice of xy‐planes or cross sections. Nondestructive mapping of the internal structures of a concrete member is a solid body, including intrinsic complexity and anisotropy of the section phase, imperfection, crack, inhomogeneities, and anisotropy. Computed tomography with X‐ray and gamma rays, and electrical impedance tomography, back scattering microwave imaging. X‐rays computed tomography shows promise in high resolution (5 μm) detection cracks and positions of rebar in concrete structure. EIT has the potential for locating rebars water filled fracture, and similar zones of high conductivity of Concrete with the possible of gaining information about corrosion around the reinforcement bars. Back scattering microwave imaging can be used to inspect flat surfaces and to locate rebars within 6 to 7 cm depth from the concrete surfaces. The electrical tomography is a technique in expensive and availability and works fast and easy. X‐ray computed tomography needs a more elaborate and expensive measurements and operations.
“…Material properties and component geometry can affect the dispersion properties of AE, where the propagating velocity of the extensional and flexural wave modes changes with frequency in thin structures such as aircraft skins [9]. Typically, this relation can be determined analytically for simple plate-like structures; however, these equations rapidly become very complicated with increased geometrical complexity of the structure [10][11][12][13][14][15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This challenge is further compounded with complex geometry and increased wave propagation distance where the effects of reflection, attenuation [17] and dispersion [18] can be pronounced. Furthermore, additional effects include dispersion due to material anisotropy [19], as well as wave mode conversion, where a particular wave mode changes to another; and complexities in the geometry of the structure [11,20].…”
Acoustic Emission (AE) monitoring can be used to detect and locate structural damage such as growing fatigue cracks. The accuracy of damage location and consequently the inference of its significance for damage assessment is dependent on the wave propagation properties in terms of wave velocity, dispersion, attenuation and wave mode conversion. These behaviors are understood and accounted for in simplistic structures; however, actual structures are geometrically complex, with components comprising of different materials. One of the key challenges in such scenarios is the ability to positively identify wave modes and correctly associate their properties for damage location analysis. In this study, a novel method for wave mode identification is presented based on phase and instantaneous frequency analysis. Finite Element (FE) simulations and experiments on a representative aircraft wing structure were conducted to evaluate the performance of the technique. The results show how a phase analysis obtained from a Hilbert Transform of the wave signal in combination with variations of the instantaneous frequency of the wave signal, can be used to determine the arrival and therefore identification of the different wave modes on a complex structure. The methodology outlined in this paper was proven on an Automatic Sensor Test wave signal, Pencil Lead Breaks and Hanning windows and it was shown that the percentage difference is between 3% and 15% for the A0 and S0 wave speed respectively.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.