2012
DOI: 10.1002/stc.511
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Damage identification of beam-like structures with contiguous and distributed damage

Abstract: Structural health monitoring of existing infrastructure is currently an active field of research, where elaborate experimental programs and advanced analytical methods are used in identifying the current state of health of critical structures. Change of static deflection as the indicator of damage is the simplest tool in a structural health monitoring scenario of bridges that is least exploited in damage identification strategies. In this paper, some simple and elegant equations based on loss of symmetry due t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In existing papers dealing with damage localization and estimation of damage severity using only static displacements the deviation of simulated and calculated values of damage are up to 18% (Yang, Sun 2011), 20% (Maity, Saha 2004), 30% (Terlaje, Truman 2007), 40% (Bakhtiari-Nejad et al 2005), 60% (Chen et al 2005). The method proposed by RaghuPrasad et al (2013) gives the smallest deviation of simulated and calculated damages of 8%, but the method is limited to detection and severity estimation of single damage. In all these damage severity estimation methods the length of damage was equal to the length taken into damage estimation analysis (whole segment length); no one deals with detection and severity estimation of damages shorter than the segment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In existing papers dealing with damage localization and estimation of damage severity using only static displacements the deviation of simulated and calculated values of damage are up to 18% (Yang, Sun 2011), 20% (Maity, Saha 2004), 30% (Terlaje, Truman 2007), 40% (Bakhtiari-Nejad et al 2005), 60% (Chen et al 2005). The method proposed by RaghuPrasad et al (2013) gives the smallest deviation of simulated and calculated damages of 8%, but the method is limited to detection and severity estimation of single damage. In all these damage severity estimation methods the length of damage was equal to the length taken into damage estimation analysis (whole segment length); no one deals with detection and severity estimation of damages shorter than the segment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the theoretical formulation is based on assumption of materially linear structure, the method can be successfully used for detection of changes in structural stiffness as result of changes in E-modules and/or moment if inertia I as it is done in some previous researches (RaghuPrasad et al 2013;Capozucca 2008;Ndambi et al 2000Ndambi et al , 2002.…”
Section: Damage Severity Estimation Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dynamic identification of damage has been widely explored in the literature because of the easiness in the measurement of the natural frequencies [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9] and, to a smaller extent, of the modes [10][11][12]. On the other hand, a limited effort was dedicated to the static identification of damage [13][14][15][16], for different structural typologies, mainly by employing displacement measurements, that are more sensitive to instrumental errors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the pioneering study by Sanayei and Onipede, [18] an analytical method that makes use of static data test is employed to assess the damage in frames. More recently, regarding the static identification of damage parameters in structures, further studies were devoted to propose an alternative strategy for frames, [19] to assess instrumental errors with reference to beam-like structures, [20] to the identification of damage in arches, [21] to the identification of diffuse damage in beam-like structures [22] and to the identification of multiple concentrated cracks in beams by making use of evolutionary algorithms for the optimization procedure. [23] In this paper, by utilizing the solution provided by the mentioned distributional approach, a further contribution towards the identification of multiple cracks in straight beams by static response measurements, leading to explicit expressions for damage positions and severities, is provided.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%