2020
DOI: 10.3390/s20030733
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Damage Identification in Structural Health Monitoring: A Brief Review from its Implementation to the Use of Data-Driven Applications

Abstract: The damage identification process provides relevant information about the current state of a structure under inspection, and it can be approached from two different points of view. The first approach uses data-driven algorithms, which are usually associated with the collection of data using sensors. Data are subsequently processed and analyzed. The second approach uses models to analyze information about the structure. In the latter case, the overall performance of the approach is associated with the accuracy … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
35
0
4

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 186 publications
(200 reference statements)
0
35
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Using CMOD can only provide information about crack length, but ML technology can provide full-field information about the crack path, crack tip, multiple cracks, and the distribution of the stress field at the crack-tip vicinity in real time. These features are desired in developing a structural health monitoring system to characterize the structural integrity of large structures such as bridges and buildings [24,43]. ML technology can be a reliable and effective tool for SHMS because it is a full-field and noncontacting measurement system with a short response time that is cost-effective and offers simplicity in application and data processing.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using CMOD can only provide information about crack length, but ML technology can provide full-field information about the crack path, crack tip, multiple cracks, and the distribution of the stress field at the crack-tip vicinity in real time. These features are desired in developing a structural health monitoring system to characterize the structural integrity of large structures such as bridges and buildings [24,43]. ML technology can be a reliable and effective tool for SHMS because it is a full-field and noncontacting measurement system with a short response time that is cost-effective and offers simplicity in application and data processing.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aging infrastructure and increasing operational loads require development and implementation of effective methods for structural monitoring [ 1 , 2 , 3 ]. Within the last two decades, the related field of structural health monitoring (SHM) has witnessed a rapid progress in basic research approaches [ 4 , 5 ], in technology [ 6 ], as well as an increasing number of successful practical applications [ 7 , 8 , 9 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SHM consists of integrating the sensor devices with the structural components to extract continuous information related to the mechanical behaviour of a structure in various operational conditions [ 5 , 6 ]. Different types of sensors such as microelectromechanical systems (MEMS), accelerometers, optical fibres, vibration sensors, pressure-based sensors [ 7 ], and global positioning system (GPS) sensors [ 8 ] can be used during the SHM process for measuring a wide range of critical structural parameters, such as strain, temperature, displacement, pressure, and vibration [ 9 ]. Among all the structural parameters, strain can be considered as an important parameter, which can be utilised for SHM.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%