2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruc.2011.10.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Damage identification in Euler frames

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 1 shows different cases for the crack location and the ratio of the crack depth to section height d/h, along with the corresponding first four natural frequencies, calculated accurately up to the fifth decimal place using the method described in [10]. It is generally reported that the minimum number of required natural frequencies for crack detection is three, as in [33]. Referring to Fig.…”
Section: Numerical Examplesmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Table 1 shows different cases for the crack location and the ratio of the crack depth to section height d/h, along with the corresponding first four natural frequencies, calculated accurately up to the fifth decimal place using the method described in [10]. It is generally reported that the minimum number of required natural frequencies for crack detection is three, as in [33]. Referring to Fig.…”
Section: Numerical Examplesmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The cracked beam finite element was used at the crack location and the method was verified experimentally. Greco and Pau [33] incorporated the rotational spring stiffness in the exact dynamic stiffness matrix of a cracked frame. The optimisation criterion was the least sum of squares of the differences between the theoretical and experimental values of the variation between the uncracked and cracked natural frequencies with respect to the uncracked frequencies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the approach generally requires subtle analysis in order to deal with the possible nonconvexity of the error function and, as a consequence, with the appearance of multiple local and global minima. In connection with this point, see the interesting analysis presented in Vestroni and Capecchi (2000) and the recent contribution by Greco and Pau (2012) on crack identification in a frame.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The procedure is based on the so-called crack scanning method, recently proposed by the same authors, and on an improved Rayleigh's quotient type technique for calculating the crack induced changes in the natural frequencies. The detection of concentrated damage in more complex structures, such as parabolic arches or frames, by measured frequency variations has been approached in the papers by Pau et al [17], [9]. Caddemi and Caliò [2], [3] have recently developed a multiple crack damage identification procedure in beams based on closed form solutions of the free vibration problem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%