2018
DOI: 10.3390/s18093033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Damage Identification for Underground Structure Based on Frequency Response Function

Abstract: Damage identification that is based on modal analysis is widely used in traditional structural damage identification. However, modal analysis is difficult in high damping structures and modal concentrated structures. Unlike approaches based on modal analysis, damage identification based on the frequency response function allows for the avoidance of error and easy verification through other test points. An updating algorithm is devised is this study by utilizing the frequency response function together with the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The damping of vehicle tire c3(t) is assumed to change with time as in Equation 16, where t3 is the moment of the largest deformation of the vehicle spring: Trial and iteration are required to determine t3 and c3(t). The main steps are described as follows: first, given an initial large value of t3, c3(t) is determined via Equation (16). Second, the vibration of the vehicle in Figure 6 during time period [t2, t3] is computed by integrating Equation (17) with the initial velocity v0 and the initial state xb of the bridge.…”
Section: Contact and Impact Stagementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The damping of vehicle tire c3(t) is assumed to change with time as in Equation 16, where t3 is the moment of the largest deformation of the vehicle spring: Trial and iteration are required to determine t3 and c3(t). The main steps are described as follows: first, given an initial large value of t3, c3(t) is determined via Equation (16). Second, the vibration of the vehicle in Figure 6 during time period [t2, t3] is computed by integrating Equation (17) with the initial velocity v0 and the initial state xb of the bridge.…”
Section: Contact and Impact Stagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Structural dynamic characteristics are often used to detect damage by assessing their changes between an intact structure and a damaged structure. Structural modal parameters, such as natural frequencies, mode shapes, modal mass and stiffness, are popular as dynamic indices for damage identification [16][17][18][19], and are easily obtained due to the rapid development of experiment modal analysis techniques. For example, Wang et al [20] extracted the fundamental frequency of a bridge from the responses of an ordinary vehicle with its parameters calibrated in advance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have focused on damage identification based on structural global responses. Based on natural frequency responses, Sha et al [10][11][12] carried out damage detection in beams, aluminum samples, and a soil box according to numerical simulations and experiments. The results demonstrated the capability of the methods to localize damage and to estimate the damage severity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there is as yet a lack of advanced damage identification methods matched with such advanced sensing technologies. Existing SHM based damage detection methods employ dynamic characteristics such as natural frequencies [13,14,15,16,17], mode shapes [18,19,20,21], modal curvatures [22,23,24,25], and wavelet transform coefficients [26,27,28], to establish damage features. Among those methods, wavelet transform based diagnosis of damage has been adopted extensively with advantages in the time-frequency and multi-resolution analysis of measured dynamic responses of structures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%