2016
DOI: 10.1177/1056789516671775
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Damage-fragmentation transition: Size effect and scaling behavior for impact fragmentation of slender projectiles

Abstract: The focus of the present article is on the size effect of a transition region from the damaged to the fragmented phase in impact-induced breakup of a slender projectile. Molecular dynamics simulations of the classic ballistic Taylor test are performed with a simple generic model to explore an extended low-energy range. In the simulation setup, flat-ended, monocrystalline, nanoscale projectiles, with a fixed aspect ratio but 10 different diameters, collide perpendicularly with a rough rigid wall. With gradually… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
(139 reference statements)
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, the 2D-MD simulation results (Mastilovic, 2015a(Mastilovic, , 2016a(Mastilovic, , 2016b confirm that fragment mass distributions are generally of the Poisson hyper-exponential type as experimentally verified for ductile materials (e.g., Mayers, 1994). As far as the strain rate effect on the fragment mass is concerned, the MD simulation result presented by Eq.…”
Section: Validation Of the MD Simulation Modelsupporting
confidence: 48%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…For example, the 2D-MD simulation results (Mastilovic, 2015a(Mastilovic, , 2016a(Mastilovic, , 2016b confirm that fragment mass distributions are generally of the Poisson hyper-exponential type as experimentally verified for ductile materials (e.g., Mayers, 1994). As far as the strain rate effect on the fragment mass is concerned, the MD simulation result presented by Eq.…”
Section: Validation Of the MD Simulation Modelsupporting
confidence: 48%
“…It cannot be overstated that this robust MD model requires only three material input parameters (the atomic mass and diameter, and the strength of attraction); obviously, only a limited quantitative agreement with experimental data could be expected under such circumstances. The main limitations of the present model have been already discussed in the preceding article (Mastilovic, 2016b).…”
Section: Validation Of the MD Simulation Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations