2019
DOI: 10.1177/1056789519854488
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Damage evolution in fibrous composites caused by interfacial debonding

Abstract: Interfacial debonding between fibers and matrix is one of the dominant damage types in fibrous composites. This paper investigates weakening effect due to the interfacial debonding. For simplification, the fibers are assumed to be rigid since the modulii and strength of fibers are much greater than those of matrix, and the distribution of the radii of fibers is assumed to obey the logarithmic normal distribution. The matrix is assumed to be a viscoelastic material. The boundary of the composite is subjected to… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Interfacial behavior between yarns and matrix can not be ignored (Ju and Ko, 2008; Yang et al., 2019). Different from the multi-layer and single-layer interface models for laminated composites (Koloor et al., 2017, 2018), the geometry of the Ω-shape composite component was too complex to build a layer-to-layer constructions between 3 D woven yarns and resin matrix.…”
Section: Numerical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interfacial behavior between yarns and matrix can not be ignored (Ju and Ko, 2008; Yang et al., 2019). Different from the multi-layer and single-layer interface models for laminated composites (Koloor et al., 2017, 2018), the geometry of the Ω-shape composite component was too complex to build a layer-to-layer constructions between 3 D woven yarns and resin matrix.…”
Section: Numerical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In media with continuous reinforcement (long fibres), the longitudinal behaviour (tension 11) appears to be linear elastic up to the material brittle failure due to fibres breakage. The transverse behaviour (tension 22 and/or in-plane shear 12) exhibits a more progressive degradation induced by the growth of a diffuse micro-crack network that initiates by debonding at the fibre/matrix interfaces and propagates by coalescence (Yang et al., 2020). To represent this behaviour, the constitutive model specifically developed for this type of materials (Praud, 2018; Praud et al., 2017b) is utilized to describe the response of the yarn phase.…”
Section: Local Constitutive Model For the Yarnsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Micromechanics-informed damage models permit taking the stochastics on the microscale into account naturally, e. g., for progressive fiber breakage in fiber-reinforced composites (Ju and Wu, 2016; Wu and Ju, 2017), interfacial transition-zone effects (Chen et al., 2018), uncertainty in the elastic moduli of fiber-reinforced concrete (Liu et al., 2020), localized microcracks (Li et al., 2020) or random loading in fatigue processes (Franko et al., 2017). Another advantage concerns modeling the unilateral character of brittle damage, i. e., a different damaging behavior under tension compared to compression (Goidescu et al., 2015; Zhang et al., 2019), and accounting for interface debonding (Pupurs and Varna, 2017; Schemmann et al., 2018b; Yang et al., 2020). However, care has to be taken as homogenization and localization are incompatible (Gitman et al., 2007), in general, i.e., upon localization, the volume elements considered will not be representative for the effective mechanical behavior (Drugan and Willis, 1996; Hill, 1963; Kanit et al., 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%