2016
DOI: 10.1088/0957-0233/27/4/045110
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Damage detection on mesosurfaces using distributed sensor network and spectral diffusion maps

Abstract: Abstract. In this work, we develop a data-driven method for the diagnosis of damage in mesoscale mechanical structures using an array of distributed sensor networks. The proposed approach relies on comparing intrinsic geometries of data sets corresponding to the undamage and damage states of the system. We use spectral diffusion map approach for identifying the intrinsic geometry of the data set. In particular, time series data from distributed sensors is used for the construction of diffusion maps. The low di… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A challenge in deploying SHM solutions to civil structures and structural members is in the large geometries under consideration, whereas sensors need to be strategically deployed in order to provide rich-enough data that can yield to condition-based information. 3 This can be done using sparse 4 and dense 5 networks of sensors measuring strain, 6,7 acceleration, 811 and other 1214 states.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A challenge in deploying SHM solutions to civil structures and structural members is in the large geometries under consideration, whereas sensors need to be strategically deployed in order to provide rich-enough data that can yield to condition-based information. 3 This can be done using sparse 4 and dense 5 networks of sensors measuring strain, 6,7 acceleration, 811 and other 1214 states.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the past decade, the majority of research works in the field of structural health monitoring (SHM) have been thus far focused on the development of damage detection and localization algorithms using various approaches such as laser Doppler velocimetry, fiber Bragg grating, piezoelectric wafer active sensors (PWASs), piezoelectric paint, and intelligent resistive coating materials (Bai et al, 2015; Barazanchy et al (2014); Cao and Ouyang, 2016; Chinde et al, 2016; Fan and Qiao, 2011; Feng et al, 2014; Giurgiutiu, 2014; Kaloop and Hu, 2015; Kharroub et al, 2015; Kumar and Reddy, 2016; Peters and Webb, 2015; Statham, 2011; Wang et al (2016); Witos, 2008; Xu and Giurgiutiu, 2005, 2006; Yang and Fritzen, 2011a, 2011b, 2012) Zhao et al (2007). SHM based on electromechanical impedance (EMI) of piezoelectric transducers was first reported by Giurgiutiu and Zagrai (2000) to compare the impedance/admittance frequency spectrum of pristine and damaged specimens, particularly at an ultrasonic frequency range of 100 Hz–12 MHz.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The efficient management of aging infrastructure network, as well as the preventive conservation of civil structures and, in particular, of heritage ones, that are exposed to various natural and anthropogenic hazards, are stimulating scientific research toward the development of automated structural condition assessment strategies. Similar strategies are commonly referred to as Structural Health Monitoring (SHM) systems, whose main goal is using field observations of the response of a structure in operational conditions for damage diagnosis and health prognosis (Farrar and Worden, ; Jiang and Adeli, ; Laflamme et al., ; Park et al., ; Shan et al., ; Zhong and Xiang, ; Chinde et al., ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%