2018
DOI: 10.1007/s42107-018-0065-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Damage detection of truss structures by hybrid immune system and teaching–learning-based optimization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, the TLBO method has been hybridized with other optimization algorithms to address CHPED problems and improve overall efficiency [31]. For instance, TLBO algorithm incorporated with a genetic algorithm, particle swarm optimization, Gaussian random variables, opposition-based learning, adaptive grasshopper optimization, and immune system algorithm are presented in [32][33][34]. In this study, we have hybridized a new version of TLBO (which is inspired by enthusiasm learning mechanism) with particle swarm optimization (PSO) because of its noticeable performance and efficiency for finding optimal solutions in various fields of engineering [35].…”
Section: Motivations and Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, the TLBO method has been hybridized with other optimization algorithms to address CHPED problems and improve overall efficiency [31]. For instance, TLBO algorithm incorporated with a genetic algorithm, particle swarm optimization, Gaussian random variables, opposition-based learning, adaptive grasshopper optimization, and immune system algorithm are presented in [32][33][34]. In this study, we have hybridized a new version of TLBO (which is inspired by enthusiasm learning mechanism) with particle swarm optimization (PSO) because of its noticeable performance and efficiency for finding optimal solutions in various fields of engineering [35].…”
Section: Motivations and Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Material properties utilized for this example are given as follows: cross-section A = 0.0025 m 2 , mass density ρ = 2770 kg/m 3 , and Young’s modulus E = 69.8 GPa. Many researchers including Kaveh et al (2019), Bureerat and Pholdee (2018), Nguyen-Thoi et al (2018), Shahrouzi and Sabzi (2018), Kaveh and Zolghadr (2015), Pholdee and Bureeratand (2016), and Kaveh et al (2016) have attempted to address this problem.…”
Section: Numerical Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A category of SHM constitutes formulation of the damage detection as an inverse problem. It can further be solved by optimization algorithms such as meta‐heuristics 4–6 . However, this approach may require the prescribed damaged state and full data to model the structure for eigenvalue analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can further be solved by optimization algorithms such as meta-heuristics. [4][5][6] However, this approach may require the prescribed damaged state and full data to model the structure for eigenvalue analysis. Another major category includes signal processing techniques as critical component vibration-based SHM.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%