2018
DOI: 10.1680/jtran.16.00146
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Damage detection of ballastless railway tracks by the impact-echo method

Abstract: The objectives of this study were to investigate the impact response of ballastless railway tracks and to study the feasibility of using the impact-echo method for the detection of typical damage to ballastless tracks. Numerical studies were carried out to acquire the transient responses of ballastless tracks subjected to impact. The numerical results were verified by experimental studies on ballastless tracks with and without damage. It was found that there is a predominant frequency whose value depends on th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Electromagnetic waves cannot pass and reflect through the ballastless track structure which contains several layers of reinforcing steel rebars [54,55]; therefore, ground penetrating radar (GPR) is not suitable to detect mud pumping in the subgrade bed under the ballastless track structure, but it can accurately detect the subgrade bed under the waterproof seal layer without reinforcing steel rebars [56,57]. According to this research based on frequency spectrum analysis [58], the contact loss between the ballastless track structure and the subgrade bed caused by mud pumping can be detected by the impact-echo method (IEM), which is an effective nondestructive testing technique widely used for detecting certain defects inside concrete elements or structures [59][60][61]. erefore, the combination of GPR with IEM was used to detect the interlayer in the ballastless track-subgrade affected by mud pumping, as shown in Figure 3.…”
Section: General Situation Of On-site Test Pointmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Electromagnetic waves cannot pass and reflect through the ballastless track structure which contains several layers of reinforcing steel rebars [54,55]; therefore, ground penetrating radar (GPR) is not suitable to detect mud pumping in the subgrade bed under the ballastless track structure, but it can accurately detect the subgrade bed under the waterproof seal layer without reinforcing steel rebars [56,57]. According to this research based on frequency spectrum analysis [58], the contact loss between the ballastless track structure and the subgrade bed caused by mud pumping can be detected by the impact-echo method (IEM), which is an effective nondestructive testing technique widely used for detecting certain defects inside concrete elements or structures [59][60][61]. erefore, the combination of GPR with IEM was used to detect the interlayer in the ballastless track-subgrade affected by mud pumping, as shown in Figure 3.…”
Section: General Situation Of On-site Test Pointmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of them inspected the internal defects (e.g., cracks and voids) and interlayer gaps of track structures by non-destructive detection techniques. The detection methods utilized include impact-echo method [23,24], ground-penetrating radar method [25,26], and modal testing method [27]. Some researchers also utilized distributed optical fiber sensors to monitor the deformation of track structures [28,29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the detection of void defects under track slabs still mainly relies on manual inspection and flaw detection by railway workers during the high-speed railway overhaul period (also known as the ''skylight period''). 4 If the void defect is not found in time, the consequences could be disastrous. Especially in the high-temperature season, void defects occur frequently and determining how to quickly and accurately perform non-contact dynamic detection of void defects under track slabs has become a core problem that needs to be solved in the maintenance of high-speed railway lines.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%