2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruc.2011.02.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Damage detection method for shear buildings using the changes in the first mode shape slopes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The differences in the POM data sets extracted from the FRFs with a step of 0.02 Hz in the frequency range of 26-28 Hz at two states before and after the mass 6,7,8,9,10. Each plot has two curves depending on the existence of external noise.…”
Section: Damage Detection Of a Two-dimensional Frame Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The differences in the POM data sets extracted from the FRFs with a step of 0.02 Hz in the frequency range of 26-28 Hz at two states before and after the mass 6,7,8,9,10. Each plot has two curves depending on the existence of external noise.…”
Section: Damage Detection Of a Two-dimensional Frame Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Utilizing the change in the first mode shape slopes and the sensitivity of modal parameters, Zhu et al [7] presented a damage detection method for shear buildings. Morita and Teshigawara [8] presented the parameter identification method and damage estimation method using the results obtained from the shaking table test of Abstract The structural health evaluation is performed by comparing the responses between the undamaged and damaged states.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, defect identification algorithms can be divided into model based and non-model based procedures according to using finite element model (FEM) or not. Algorithms [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16] based on FEM assess structural defects by modifying structural FEM according to structural responses. The modifications of structural FEM will indicate the location and severity of the defect.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3] Generally, the existing damage detection approaches can be clarified into two major categories, that is, the dynamic detection methods and the static detection methods. Significant efforts have already been devoted to developing dynamic detection methods using various vibration characteristics, such as natural frequencies, [4][5][6] mode shapes, [7][8][9][10][11] modal flexibility, [12][13][14][15] curvature, 11,16 modal strain energy, [17][18][19] and moving load responses. [20][21][22] Radzien´ski et al 10 defined new damage indicators based on the change in natural frequencies and any mode shape (measured or modeled) for beam-like structures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%