2018
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)as.1943-5525.0000885
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Damage Detection and Finite-Element Model Updating of Structural Components through Point Cloud Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Once a remotely sensed defect in a structural component is detected through computer vision [34], the first step in the modeling process is to parameterize it so that a stochastic dynamic model can be reliably fit the extracted parameters, or a “feature vector” to track the defect evolution over time. The complex nature of point cloud data necessitates this low-dimensional parameterization, as tracking each individual point in a cloud would lead to an intractably high number of time-series model coefficients.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Once a remotely sensed defect in a structural component is detected through computer vision [34], the first step in the modeling process is to parameterize it so that a stochastic dynamic model can be reliably fit the extracted parameters, or a “feature vector” to track the defect evolution over time. The complex nature of point cloud data necessitates this low-dimensional parameterization, as tracking each individual point in a cloud would lead to an intractably high number of time-series model coefficients.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In complement to the expanding use of these technologies, there are now a variety of methods for isolating and extracting defects from 2D or 3D images [30,31], and advancements in deep machine learning methods portend future improvements [32,33]. A key advantage of these data sources is the direct link between quantified geometric changes and changes in the underlying mechanical performance that can be captured in finite element analysis, as evidenced by a variety of prior work [34,35,36]. While such capabilities provide valuable tools for structural assessment, they do not explicitly quantify life-cycle dynamics and forecasts of future defect conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Wang et al (2018a) investigate a damage identification technique based on the Laplace transform-based spectral element method (LTSEM) and strain statistical moment (SSM). Ghahremani et al (2018) present a localized methodology for the automatic and systematic detection and quantification of damage in structural components using high-fidelity three-dimensional (3D) point cloud data, followed by a corresponding local update to a finite-element (FE) model. Xiong et al (2018) investigate structural dynamical monitoring to identify the presence of bridge scouring through tracing the changes of vibration characteristics induced by scour.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%