2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.compgeo.2014.03.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Damage characterization during laboratory strength testing: A 3D-finite-discrete element approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

2
23
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The hybrid FDEM incorporates the advantages of both continuum and discontinuum methods and can realistically simulate the transition from continuum to discontinuum caused by rock fracture. Two main implementations of the hybrid FDEM include Y code and the commercial code ELFEN . Several attempts have been made to actively extend the Y code, such as Y‐GEO, IRAZU, Solidity, HOSS with MUNROU, and Y‐Flow .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The hybrid FDEM incorporates the advantages of both continuum and discontinuum methods and can realistically simulate the transition from continuum to discontinuum caused by rock fracture. Two main implementations of the hybrid FDEM include Y code and the commercial code ELFEN . Several attempts have been made to actively extend the Y code, such as Y‐GEO, IRAZU, Solidity, HOSS with MUNROU, and Y‐Flow .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ELFEN uses MPI in its parallelization scheme and has been employed successfully in 2D and 3D simulations of the rock fracture process. For example, 3D fracture process analysis of a conventional laboratory test using up to 3 million elements has been reported . Additionally, Xiang et al optimized the contact detection algorithm in their Solidity code and parallelized the code using OpenMP; they modeled a packing system with 288 rock‐like boulders and showed that a speedup of 9 times on 12 CPU threads can be achieved (although the details of the applied algorithm and its implementation were not provided).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…DEM has been proven to be more suitable tool than Finite Element Method (FEM) and Finite Volume Method (FVM) to simulate compaction [45,46]. Some researchers have also used the hybrid approaches-a combination of Finite-Discrete Element Methods-FDEM to analyze geomechanical problems [25,[47][48][49][50][51][52][53]. FDEM and Y-Geo software, despite their limitations (mesh sensitivity, lack of hydro-mechanical coupling and fluid propagation in the cracks, long computational times), has effectively simulated complex rock slope instability problems from triggering, initiation, evolution, run out and deposition processes [47,54].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%