2015
DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/628/1/012019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Damage assessment through changes in mode shapes due to non-proportional damping

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To this aim, the amount of complexity of mode shapes is evaluated via a non‐negative scalar function (a sort of norm) allowing to follow the damage evolution path. Resorting to the results in Iezzi et al, 28 for discrete n degrees‐of‐freedom systems the following complexity indexes I h , h = 1, 2, … , 5 are eligible and effective for localised damage (| • | and ‖ • ‖ stand for absolute value and Euclidean norm, respectively): modal polygons 38 I1=truei=1nAinAmax,1emAmax=ncos()πnsin()πn, where A i is the area enclosed by the polygon representing the modal components of U i , L in the complex plane, whereas A max is the maximum potential area of modal polygons; phase differences 38 I2=truei=1nφi,maxφi,minnπ with φ i the phase angles of the displacement normalised i th mode and subscripts denoting maximum and minimum value; the φ i span the first quadrant of Gauss' plane and are the phase angles of the vectors | Re ( U i , L ) | + ı | Im ( U i , L )|; modal collinearity 32 I3=truei=1n1nfalse|Refalse(boldUi,Lfalse)TImfalse(boldUi,Lfalse)false|false[Refalse(boldUi,Lfalse)T…”
Section: Governing Equationsmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…To this aim, the amount of complexity of mode shapes is evaluated via a non‐negative scalar function (a sort of norm) allowing to follow the damage evolution path. Resorting to the results in Iezzi et al, 28 for discrete n degrees‐of‐freedom systems the following complexity indexes I h , h = 1, 2, … , 5 are eligible and effective for localised damage (| • | and ‖ • ‖ stand for absolute value and Euclidean norm, respectively): modal polygons 38 I1=truei=1nAinAmax,1emAmax=ncos()πnsin()πn, where A i is the area enclosed by the polygon representing the modal components of U i , L in the complex plane, whereas A max is the maximum potential area of modal polygons; phase differences 38 I2=truei=1nφi,maxφi,minnπ with φ i the phase angles of the displacement normalised i th mode and subscripts denoting maximum and minimum value; the φ i span the first quadrant of Gauss' plane and are the phase angles of the vectors | Re ( U i , L ) | + ı | Im ( U i , L )|; modal collinearity 32 I3=truei=1n1nfalse|Refalse(boldUi,Lfalse)TImfalse(boldUi,Lfalse)false|false[Refalse(boldUi,Lfalse)T…”
Section: Governing Equationsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…To this aim, the amount of complexity of mode shapes is evaluated via a non-negative scalar function (a sort of norm) allowing to follow the damage evolution path. Resorting to the results in Iezzi et al, 28 for discrete n degrees-of-freedom systems the following complexity indexes I h , h = 1, 2, … , 5 are eligible and effective for localised damage (j • j and ‖ • ‖ stand for absolute value and Euclidean norm, respectively):…”
Section: Modal Complexity For Damage Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As specified in [12][13][14][15][16] it is known that the local damage occurring between two lumped mass elements causes a discontinuity in the difference between the damaged and undamaged eigenvectors. The relation between the damage index vector { , } and the normalized ′th mode shown in Eq.…”
Section: The Cases Of Unit Pulse and White Noise Input Excitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on these considerations, over the last decades several contributions have spread in the literature trying to verify the relationship between damage and modal complexity in order to exploit this information for structural health monitoring of existing artefacts. Worth of mention are the pioneering work of Kawiecki [18], who tried to use the modal damping characteristics of a tested structure for damage detection; the investigations carried out by Iezzi et al [22], [23], [24], who applied and validated the effectiveness of a measurable complexity index to detect the presence of damage in framed structures having a typical "shear-type" behaviour; the study of Masciotta et al [14], who embarked on the analysis of the real and imaginary components of complex eigenvectors for damage localization; and the very recent study of Lofrano et al [21], who proposed a numerical approach based on a perturbation method to detect, locate and quantify the damage in framed structures by exploiting state-of-the-art complexity indices. Despite the scientific robustness of the developed approaches and the consensus reached on the pivotal role that complex eigenmodes can play as a measure of structural damage, the applicative counterparts have shown some limitations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%