Structural Health Monitoring 2015 2015
DOI: 10.12783/shm2015/27
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Damage Assessment in Adhesively Bonded Structures by Using SmartSHM

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, Kouhei et al [17] developed SHM that qualitatively evaluated the structural integrity of the bond-line for CFRP structure by analyzing changes in the amplitude and phase of Lamb waves travelling through bonded components. Preisler et al [18] proposed a strain based SHM system for single and double lap bonded joints which monitored the outof-plane deformation near the edges of the bonded region on the lap joint. However, this study did not address the effects of changes in the adhesive properties due to environmental effects and the load path change at location other than the lap joints.…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, Kouhei et al [17] developed SHM that qualitatively evaluated the structural integrity of the bond-line for CFRP structure by analyzing changes in the amplitude and phase of Lamb waves travelling through bonded components. Preisler et al [18] proposed a strain based SHM system for single and double lap bonded joints which monitored the outof-plane deformation near the edges of the bonded region on the lap joint. However, this study did not address the effects of changes in the adhesive properties due to environmental effects and the load path change at location other than the lap joints.…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pattern propagation considered in this work has been described as ''commonly occurring'' by other authors. 2 The degradation of the bond-line was modeled numerically by reducing the shear modulus in the 10-mm-thick layer in contact with the metal plates (shear modulus reduction, G b# = G b /10). For the geometry and mechanical properties considered, the degradation introduced at the interface corresponds to a value of the shear spring stiffness K T ' 2 3 10 13 Pa/m and the normal spring stiffness K N ' 2.5 3 10 13 Pa/m.…”
Section: Numerical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This failure scenario has been reported as relatively common on bonded lap-joint structures. 2 Unlike the case described by the numerical model, in the analytical solution derived by Dugnani and Chang, 20 the damage at the interface is introduced symmetrical on both adhesive-adherend interfaces, hence in the analytical model the damage initiates at both edges and on both interfaces simultaneously. The behavior is approximated by initially letting the magnitude of the far-field transverse spring stiffness decrease progressively from an initial value K T = N (perfect bond) to a final value Based on the analytical model and the damage scenario considered, as the interface damage approaches the near field, the peak frequency Df/f R decreases steeply followed shortly afterward by the conductance.…”
Section: Analytical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Instead of proof testing, the Polymers 2022, 14, 3816 2 of 17 regulations can also be fulfilled by limiting the possible disbond size accompanied by some kind of self-triggered repair request. For this, various adhesive layer monitoring systems with different sensory detection principles have been described in the literature [11][12][13][14]. In addition, upon a partial disbond, sensor-equipped design features have to ensure that a critical size of intact bond area is maintained under all circumstances [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%