1995
DOI: 10.1016/0263-8223(95)00002-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Damage analysis of interlaminar fracture specimens

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
165
0
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 254 publications
(167 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
165
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Their approach suffered from neglecting adhesive as a component during modeling; hence, the properties of numerical crack are representative of both the crack and material, and not exclusively the crack itself. Further, Allix et al [21] adopted different values of high initial stiffness; however, the focus of their study was on post crack-initiation behaviour in single modes. Additionally, Li et al [22] indicated that the cohesive law can be utilised to predict the transition between failure of composite and interface in mode-I.…”
Section: Relevance To Czmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their approach suffered from neglecting adhesive as a component during modeling; hence, the properties of numerical crack are representative of both the crack and material, and not exclusively the crack itself. Further, Allix et al [21] adopted different values of high initial stiffness; however, the focus of their study was on post crack-initiation behaviour in single modes. Additionally, Li et al [22] indicated that the cohesive law can be utilised to predict the transition between failure of composite and interface in mode-I.…”
Section: Relevance To Czmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The advantages of cohesive zone models are their simplicity and the unification of crack initiation and growth within one model. Moreover, cohesive zone formulations can also be easily implemented in finite element codes using decohesion elements [17]- [25]. Although the cohesive damage models cannot be considered non-local damage models [26], they allow a mesh-independent representation of material softening, provided that the mesh is sufficiently refined.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Corigliano (1993), Allix and Corigliano (1996), Allix et al (1995), Ladevèze et al (1998), Schellekens and Borst (1993), Chaboche et al (1997), Bolzon and Corigliano (1997), Chen et al (1999), Mi et al (1998), Alfano and Crisfield (2001) employed the continuum damage mechanics approach to model the degradation of non-coherent, cohesive interface elements. Cazes et al (2009), Ijaz et al (2014 provided a formulation for a non-local damage-type cohesive zone model.…”
Section: State-of-the-art Review Of Interface Elasticitymentioning
confidence: 99%