2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2012.03.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Damage accumulation in a carbon/epoxy composite: Comparison between a multiscale model and computed tomography experimental results

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

8
72
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 118 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
8
72
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The work presented here compares the experimental data with the fibre-bundle model of Swolfs et al [33][34][35][36]. A similar comparison has already been attempted in Scott et al [37]. Their model predictions were reasonable at low applied strains, but seemed to diverge at higher strains.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 59%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The work presented here compares the experimental data with the fibre-bundle model of Swolfs et al [33][34][35][36]. A similar comparison has already been attempted in Scott et al [37]. Their model predictions were reasonable at low applied strains, but seemed to diverge at higher strains.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…The same experiments as in Scott et al [37] were used, but the cluster pattern and growth were also tracked this time, leading to new insights in the failure process. Conclusions are drawn by comparing the experimental and simulated results, leading to recommendations for further model development.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the model proposed overestimated the accumulation of fibre breaks, underestimated the cluster formation, and also predicted diffuse rather than co-planar clusters in contrast with the experimental observations [20]. The underestimation of cluster formation was also found to be a weakness of a different modelling strategy documented in work by Scott et al [4]. The assessment of fibre breaks in composites under fatigue loading is not trivial due to the fact that in situ tests are highly desirable to monitor their accumulation.…”
Section: A C C E P T E D Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…Although carbon fibre composites are relatively fatigue insensitive they generally do have downward sloping S-N curves and finite life under fatigue loading [3]. However, f Fibre failure is known to constitute the critical damage mechanism in tension, for which the axial strength of unidirectional composites is assumed to be controlled by the strength distribution of the fibres [4]. Several modelling approaches have been developed to predict fibre-dominated tensile strength, taking into account the fibre strength distribution [5], stress transfer around broken fibres [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13], and the formation of clusters of fibre breaks [14,15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Depending on the geometry, strength distribution and degree of fiber/matrix debonding, the material may be able to redistribute the load successfully, leading to an accumulation of fiber breaks within the composite. 1 Eventually, a critical cluster of fiber breaks forms, [2][3][4] which is associated with a critical local stress concentration that can no longer be carried by the adjacent fibers, leading to crack propagation and, therefore, sudden and catastrophic failure of the composite. Composite structures manifest a wide range of toughening mechanisms including interfacial debonding, 5 post-debonding…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%