2014
DOI: 10.1080/02626667.2013.871014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dam risk assessment based on univariate versus bivariate statistical approaches: a case study for Argentina

Abstract: Considering floods as multivariate events allows a better statistical representation of their complexity. In this work the relevance of multivariate analysis of floods for designing or assessing the safety of hydraulic structures is discussed. A flood event is characterized by its peak flow and volume. The dependence between the variables is modelled with a copula. One thousand random pairs of variables are transformed to hydrographs, applying the Beta distribution function. Synthetic floods are routed through… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, since the aim of FFA is not the forecasting, it is not appropriate to validate on sub‐samples (e.g. Callau Poduje et al, 2014; Reddy & Ganguli, 2012; Requena et al, 2013; Salvadori & De Michele, 2004; Zhang & Singh, 2006). The depth functions are used in identifying multivariate outliers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In addition, since the aim of FFA is not the forecasting, it is not appropriate to validate on sub‐samples (e.g. Callau Poduje et al, 2014; Reddy & Ganguli, 2012; Requena et al, 2013; Salvadori & De Michele, 2004; Zhang & Singh, 2006). The depth functions are used in identifying multivariate outliers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Through the combination of two or more hydrological variables, mainly Qp and V , provide more reliability for hydraulic structure designing, water reservoir management, flood risk assessment and support flood mitigation in the studied basins (e.g. Balistrocchi et al, 2017; Callau Poduje et al, 2014; Jiang et al, 2019; Liu et al, 2019; Reddy & Ganguli, 2012; Requena et al, 2013; Salvadori & De Michele, 2004; Zhang & Singh, 2006; Zhou et al, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As regards the uncertainties in overtopping risk analysis, the effects of uncertainties in flood, reservoir characteristics, outflow discharge, initial water surface level, wind velocity, dam height, and so on have been well investigated (e.g., [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13]). Regarding approaches for overtopping risk analysis, a variety of approaches have been applied, such as stochastic differential equations (e.g., [14]), bivariate copula functions (e.g., [15][16][17]), sequential uncertainty fitting method (e.g., [18]), Latin hypercube sampling (e.g., [19,20]), maximum entropy method (e.g., [21]), and Bayesian network (e.g., [22][23][24]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These multivariate frequency analysis approaches take the relationship between hydrological elements into consideration, and thus can better represent the occurrence of floods (Mediero et al 2010, Salas andObeysekera 2014). They usually use some joint distribution functions, such as a copula function, to fit the joint distributions of multiple flood elements (Grimaldi and Serinaldi 2006, Zhang and Singh 2006, Renard and Lang 2007, Volpi and Fiori 2012, Callau Poduje et al 2014. The nonstationary multivariate distributions were also analysed using time-varying copula functions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%