2016
DOI: 10.1007/s10096-016-2845-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dalbavancin reduces biofilms of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis (MRSE)

Abstract: Activity of dalbavancin against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis (MRSE) in biofilm was investigated and the microbicidal biofilm concentrations (MBC) were determined. Biofilms obtained from ten MRSA and ten MRSE bloodstream isolates, collected from patients in the General Hospital of Vienna between 2012 and 2015, were incubated with dalbavancin in trypticase soy broth (TSB) in serial dilution from 0.0625 mg/l to 256 mg/l using a microtiter … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The management of bone and joint infection or of patients with chronic SSTI is very complex due to the biofilm life of bacteria and clinical success can only be achieved by source control in most cases [22]. Recently, high in vitro activity of dalbavancin against MRSA, MRSE and enterococcal biofilms was reported [23,24]. However, in the present study, treatment success was particularly low in MRSA infections.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…The management of bone and joint infection or of patients with chronic SSTI is very complex due to the biofilm life of bacteria and clinical success can only be achieved by source control in most cases [22]. Recently, high in vitro activity of dalbavancin against MRSA, MRSE and enterococcal biofilms was reported [23,24]. However, in the present study, treatment success was particularly low in MRSA infections.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%
“… Both dalbavancin and oritavancin have shown promising in vitro activity against stationary‐phase and biofilm‐producing S. aureus isolates, including many isolates from prosthetic joint infections, highlighting a potential role in the treatment of hardware‐related infections, which in the case of oritavancin include VRE 57–60 . Although, other antibiotics (e.g., daptomycin, ceftaroline, and telavancin) with similar activity may have more potent biofilm activity 60 …”
Section: Considerations For Selection Of Dalbavancin Versus Oritavancinmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dalbavancin has already been described as an antibiotic with a potent in vitro bactericidal activity against many gram-positive pathogens, including MRSA and MRSE, in a planktonic mode of growth (Chen et al, 2007). However, the effect of dalbavancin on bacterial biofilms remains unclear as it has only been tested in a few occasions by using standard methods such as CV staining or MIC determinations (Fernández et al, 2016;Knafl et al, 2017). The impedance-based method performed in the current manuscript allows studying of the dynamics of biofilm formation and therefore the extent of biofilm reduction at different time points, obviating the need to select for a specific endpoint (Ferrer et al, 2017b).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although dalbavancin has been proposed as a promising agent in biofilm-mediated infections, susceptibility to this antibiotic has mainly been tested using traditional microbiological tests such as microdilution or agar-based tests. However, it is well established that bacteria behave differently in a planktonic state or when forming biofilms, and there is currently limited information on its efficacy on biofilm-embedded bacteria, with only a few studies available (Meeker et al, 2016;Knafl et al, 2017;Di Pilato et al, 2020), some of them in animal models (Darouiche and Mansouri, 2005;Baldoni et al, 2013). In some cases, the efficacy of dalbavancin or vancomycin has been shown to be low, with less than an order-of-magnitude decrease in viable counts of staphylococci (Kussmann et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%