2013
DOI: 10.3168/jds.2012-5976
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dairy calving management: Description and assessment of a training program for dairy personnel

Abstract: The objective of this study was to assess the effectiveness of a comprehensive calving management program designed to enhance the flow of applied, research-based, calving information to dairy personnel. Calving personnel (n=70), serving an estimated 18,100 cows from 18 Ohio dairies, attended the calving management program (∼1h of training and ∼2h of demonstration). Description of the birth canal, behavioral signs of normal parturition (stages I to III), dystocia (presentations, positions, and postures), hygien… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
35
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(36 reference statements)
2
35
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For cows that need assistance at birth, timed intervention may reduce the negative effects of dystocia (e.g., due to increased calf birth weight or malpositions) on stillbirths, as observed in this study and elsewhere (Johanson and Berger, 2003). An intervention 60 min after the AS appearance outside the vulva reduced the proportion of stillbirths (by 9 percentage points; from 15.5 to 6.5%), at least in part for those cows that needed light assistance at birth (Schuenemann et al, 2011). In this study, intervention was provided approximately 80 min after AS appearance.…”
Section: Obstetric Interventionsupporting
confidence: 55%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For cows that need assistance at birth, timed intervention may reduce the negative effects of dystocia (e.g., due to increased calf birth weight or malpositions) on stillbirths, as observed in this study and elsewhere (Johanson and Berger, 2003). An intervention 60 min after the AS appearance outside the vulva reduced the proportion of stillbirths (by 9 percentage points; from 15.5 to 6.5%), at least in part for those cows that needed light assistance at birth (Schuenemann et al, 2011). In this study, intervention was provided approximately 80 min after AS appearance.…”
Section: Obstetric Interventionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…Hands-on demonstrations should always be available immediately after instruction not only to highlight key learning objectives, but also to provide critical feedback to participants and to make any necessary clarification. Dairy personnel have expressed strong support for these learning methodologies (Schuenemann et al, 2011).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cows in the TAI group were re-enrolled in the Ovsynch after nonpregnancy diagnosis at 91 or 200 d after AI. Stillbirth probability was set at 6.5% according to previous reports (Bicalho et al, 2008;Schuenemann et al, 2011).…”
Section: Reproductive Parameters and Programsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In an ideal situation, calving personnel would monitor prepartum cows around the clock (24 h, 7 d per week) at regular intervals. In practice, however, the frequency of observation (calving personnel walking the pen and actually observing cows every 1 h) is critical to determine the onset of the AS or feet of the calf outside the vulva and to identify cows in need of assistance (dystocia; Schuenemann et al, 2013) that likely results in stillbirth (Hunter et al, 2013). Therefore, development of monitoring systems that can predict calving time before the appearance of imminent signs of birth (AS or feet of the calf) would enable dairy producers and their personnel to implement a precision calving management program to help reduce undesirable calving-related events such as stillbirth due to late or no interventions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%