2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.annals.2020.102923
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Daily tourism volume forecasting for tourist attractions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
88
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 120 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
3
88
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In this dataset, there are 12,589 records in the testing data and 113,297 records in the training data. Additionally, the same water quality dataset is predicted with the long short-term memory (LSTM) (Bi, Liu & Li, 2020) and the RBFNN models (Moradi et al, 2020), and the prediction results are compared with those of the enhanced semi-naive Bayesian prediction model. To quantitatively represent the prediction effects of the different algorithms, the root mean square error (RMSE) (Hyndman & Koehler, 2006), mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) (de Myttenaere et al, 2016) and mean absolute error (MAE) (Willmott & Matsuura (2005)) are used as error functions; they are described in Eqs.…”
Section: Results and Validation Single Pasture Prediction Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this dataset, there are 12,589 records in the testing data and 113,297 records in the training data. Additionally, the same water quality dataset is predicted with the long short-term memory (LSTM) (Bi, Liu & Li, 2020) and the RBFNN models (Moradi et al, 2020), and the prediction results are compared with those of the enhanced semi-naive Bayesian prediction model. To quantitatively represent the prediction effects of the different algorithms, the root mean square error (RMSE) (Hyndman & Koehler, 2006), mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) (de Myttenaere et al, 2016) and mean absolute error (MAE) (Willmott & Matsuura (2005)) are used as error functions; they are described in Eqs.…”
Section: Results and Validation Single Pasture Prediction Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors of Reference [33] use the LSTM networks that can incorporate multivariate time series data including historical tourism volume data, search engine data and weather data. The model is proposed for forecasting the daily tourism volume of tourist attractions.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Neural networks usage to analyze and predict the behaviour of tourists. The authors of References [19,28] use convolutional neural networks for image analysis, References [22,[29][30][31]33] work with LSTM networks that allow memorizing previous states, Reference [27] describes recurrent networks for analyzing tourist descriptions of attractions, self-organizing maps [23,25] provide information clustering, the authors of References [16,21,30,31] use combinations of neural networks to improve prediction results. Neural networks, as a rule, work more accurately than similar models, but they require a large amount of data for correct training and revealing hidden dependencies in the provided data, and for each task the volume depends on the type of the task itself (prediction of time events requires more data than classification ) and the number of certain input parameters (the more parameters, the more data is needed to identify dependencies between them).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper, the multilayer perceptron regressor (MPR) and support vector regression (SVR) algorithms provided by Scikit-learn are chosen to predict the dissolved oxygen time series of the marine pastures. In addition, the same dataset is predicted using the RBFNN, long short-term memory (LSTM) and the autoregressive integrated moving average with exogenous variables (ARIMAX) algorithms [42]. The prediction results are compared with those of the proposed enhanced NB model.…”
Section: Comparison Of the Effects Of Different Predictive Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%