2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.cmi.2022.07.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Daily tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/emtricitabine and hydroxychloroquine for pre-exposure prophylaxis of COVID-19: a double-blind placebo-controlled randomized trial in healthcare workers

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since HCQ has proven to be able to prevent SARS-CoV-2 infection in vitro,31 32 a number of clinical trials and observational studies embarked on evaluating HCQ as prophylaxis to contain SARS-CoV-2 in the human body. Most of these studies reported non-significant associations between HCQ prophylaxis and reduced SARS-CoV-2 infection rate,15 19 21 33–50 while only a few reported HCQ prophylaxis could significantly decrease SARS-CoV-2 infection rate 51–59. Our findings of significant association between PrEP use of HCQ and reduced risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection in clinical trials are consistent with another meta-analysis of cohort studies among high-risk HCWs performed by Stricker and Fesler 60.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Since HCQ has proven to be able to prevent SARS-CoV-2 infection in vitro,31 32 a number of clinical trials and observational studies embarked on evaluating HCQ as prophylaxis to contain SARS-CoV-2 in the human body. Most of these studies reported non-significant associations between HCQ prophylaxis and reduced SARS-CoV-2 infection rate,15 19 21 33–50 while only a few reported HCQ prophylaxis could significantly decrease SARS-CoV-2 infection rate 51–59. Our findings of significant association between PrEP use of HCQ and reduced risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection in clinical trials are consistent with another meta-analysis of cohort studies among high-risk HCWs performed by Stricker and Fesler 60.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…A beneficial effect of TDF for prophylaxis or early treatment of COVID-19 is compatible with the results of two randomized trials in nonhospitalized patients. In France, a phase 2 trial in 60 outpatients with early COVID-19 found lower nasopharyngeal shedding of SARS-CoV-2 after initiation of TDF/FTC [16]; in Spain and Latin America, the EPICOS trial could not rule out a beneficial effect of TDF/FTC as preexposure prophylaxis for COVID-19 among healthcare workers, but effect estimates were very imprecise because the target sample size was not met [17]. In contrast, the PANCOVID trial in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 in Spain reported no beneficial effects of TDF/FTC compared with placebo [18].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A phase 2 trial in 60 persons with mild COVID-19, funded by Caen University Hospital in France, found reduced nasopharyngeal shedding of SARS-CoV-2 in the TDF–FTC group ( 35 ). A double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized trial studied TDF–FTC as preexposure prophylaxis in health care workers from Spain, Bolivia, and Venezuela ( 36 ). This trial, funded by the Instituto de Salud Carlos III and led by the Ministry of Health of Spain, recruited fewer than 1000 persons (out of 4000) before vaccination started and enrollment had to be halted.…”
Section: Why Didn't Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate Make It Into Random...mentioning
confidence: 99%