Daily Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Consumption, by Disability Status, Among Adults in 23 States and the District of Columbia

Kim, Sun Kyung; Park, Sohyun; Carroll, Dianna D.; Okoro, Catherine A.

doi:10.5888/pcd14.160606

Cited by 7 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 21 publications

(21 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…These findings may support the idea that SSB consumption is pervasive across gender and ethnic groups in South Africa. Contrary to a previous study,21 this study did not find an association between functional disability status and SBB.…”

Section: Discussioncontrasting

confidence: 99%

“…Response options were 1=none, 2=every day, 3=1–3 times last week, and 4=4–6 times last week 21. Daily soft drink consumption was calculated from those who said that they would drink a sweetened cold drink every day=1 and none, 1–3 times last week, or 4=4–6 times last week=0.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The risk of higher SSB consumption may be higher in specific sociodemographic groups and those with specific behavioral risk factors. Sociodemographic factors may include males,13,14,17–19 younger age groups,14,15,17,19,20 ethnicity,17,19 Blacks,14,19 lower income,12,14,17 lower education,14,17 and those with a disability 21. Behavioral factors may include smokers,13,15,19 physically inactive individuals,15,19 overweight or obese persons,17,20 unhealthy food consumption, such as fast food19 and snacks 13,17.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

<p>Prevalence and socio-behavioral factors associated with sugar-sweetened beverages consumption among 15 years and older persons in South Africa</p>

Pengpid¹,

Peltzer²

2019

DMSO

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the frequency of sugar-sweetened beverages (SSB) consumption and its relationship with socio-behavioral factors using national population-based data in South Africa. Subjects and methods: Cross-sectional data were analyzed from the South African National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (SANHANES-1) in 2012. The population sample included 15,179 adults (median age=34.0 years, interquartile range=25, range=15–98 years) who participated in the SANHANES-1. Results: Overall, the study participants consumed 33.9% none, 48.3% 1–3 times, 7.2% 4–6 times, and 10.6% every day soft drinks in the past week (or an equivalent of an average of 0.30 servings, SD=0.3, per day); 43.4% had consumed no sweetened fruit juice, 42.3% 1–3 times, 5.2% 4–6 times; and 9.1% daily sweetened fruit juice (or an equivalent of an average of 0.25 servings, SD=0.3, per day). The prevalence of daily SSB (soft drink and/or sweetened fruit juice) consumption was 16.0% (or an equivalent of an average of 0.54 servings, SD=0.5, per day). In the final logistic regression model, younger age, urban residence, perceived overweight, fruit consumption, fresh fruit juice consumption, and having had processed meat and fried food from street vendors were associated with SSB consumption. In addition, problem drinking and physical activity were associated with daily soft drink consumption, and higher sedentary time was associated with daily sweetened fruit juice consumption. Conclusions: The study found a high prevalence of daily SSB consumption and identified several socio-behavioral factors that can be targeted in public health intervention programs.

show abstract

Section: Discussioncontrasting

confidence: 99%

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

<p>Prevalence and socio-behavioral factors associated with sugar-sweetened beverages consumption among 15 years and older persons in South Africa</p>

Pengpid¹,

Peltzer²

2019

DMSO

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In addition, ASD children had unique food preferences ( 39 ), which may have also affected their diet, particularly SSB intake. The previous research reported that individuals with the developmental disabilities were more susceptible to the negative health outcomes associated with SSBs ( 40 ); however, this also depends on the education level of the child's mother. A relatively highly educated mother may decrease their child's SSB intake ( 41 ), therefore, reducing the associated risks, considering the fact that over 50% of the mothers in the ASD group had a bachelor's degree or above, which may explain the lack of differences in SSB intake between ASD and TD children in our study.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Intake and Motor Function Among Autistic and Typically Developed Children

Cao

Jin

et al. 2022

Front. Nutr.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background and ObjectivesThe relationship between brain function and sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) is widely explored, but the motor function was not included. We aim to explore the relationship between SSBs and motor function among children with or without autism.MethodsParticipants were a representative autism sample (ASD, n = 106) comprising ages ranging 6–9 years and their age-matched typical counterparts (TD, n = 207), recruited in the research center of Guangzhou, China. Valid questionnaires of parent-reported including weekly SSBs intake, physical activity (PA), sedentary time (ST), and motor coordination function was used to collect relevant information. SSBs intake was further classified as no intake (no habit of taking SSBs), small to medium intake (<375 ml/week), and large intake (375 ml/week or more). Physical activity, sedentary time, and motor coordination function among the mentioned three groups as well as ASD vs. TD was compared via general linear models.ResultsCompared with TD children, ASD children showed less vigorous PA (4.23 ± 0.34 h vs. 2.77 ± 0.49 h, p = 0.015) as well as overall sedentary time (5.52 ± 1.89 h vs. 3.67 ± 0.28 h, 3.49 ± 0.16 h vs. 2.68 ± 0.24 h, and 34.59 ± 1.15 h vs. 23.69 ± 1.69 h, TD vs. ASD, sedentary time at weekdays, weekends and total ST in a week, respectively, all p < 0.05), lower scores in the developmental coordination disorder questionnaire (fine motor and handwriting: 14.21 ± 0.26 vs. 12.30 ± 0.38, general coordination: 28.90 ± 0.36 vs. 25.17 ± 0.53, control during movement: 24.56 ± 0.36 vs. 18.86 ± 0.53, and total score: 67.67 ± 0.75 vs. 56.33 ± 1.10, TD vs. ASD, all p < 0.05). Stratified by SSBs intake, TD children with small to medium SSBs intake showed the lowest sedentary time both on weekdays and weekends (all p < 0.05), they also performed worst in fine motor and handwriting skills (p < 0.05).ConclusionThe association between SSBs and motor function was observed in typical development children, but not autistic children. A larger sample size study with a longitudinal design is warranted to confirm the association between SSBs and sedentary time among typically developed children and the potential causation direction.

show abstract

Nutrition

Subach¹,

Klein²

2019

Handbook of Intellectual Disabilities

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Daily Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Consumption, by Disability Status, Among Adults in 23 States and the District of Columbia

Cited by 7 publications

References 21 publications

<p>Prevalence and socio-behavioral factors associated with sugar-sweetened beverages consumption among 15 years and older persons in South Africa</p>

<p>Prevalence and socio-behavioral factors associated with sugar-sweetened beverages consumption among 15 years and older persons in South Africa</p>

Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Intake and Motor Function Among Autistic and Typically Developed Children

Nutrition

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About