2014
DOI: 10.1037/a0038072
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Daily stress magnifies the association between cognitive decline and everyday memory problems: An integration of longitudinal and diary methods.

Abstract: We examined whether long-term fluid cognitive decline was associated with memory problems in everyday life, and whether stress plays a moderating role. We expected that the association between cognitive decline and everyday memory problems would be magnified in the context of self-reported and physiological stress. Data are from the Boston Longitudinal Study, a subsample of the Midlife in the United States study. Participants in the current study (n=112) completed a battery of tests measuring fluid cognitive f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
39
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
(96 reference statements)
3
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, our findings suggest that self-report of frequency of everyday memory lapses are associated with both concomitant and longitudinal changes in objective memory performance when measured by daily diaries. Our findings are also consistent with other studies showing associations between daily diaries of everyday memory lapses and objective memory performance (e.g., Rickenbach et al, 2014). …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, our findings suggest that self-report of frequency of everyday memory lapses are associated with both concomitant and longitudinal changes in objective memory performance when measured by daily diaries. Our findings are also consistent with other studies showing associations between daily diaries of everyday memory lapses and objective memory performance (e.g., Rickenbach et al, 2014). …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Findings showing that self-reported complaints of memory problems are related to laboratory memory performance have been mixed, when measured both concurrently (e.g., Dux et al, 2008; Ossher et al, 2013; Whitbourne et al, 2008) and longitudinally (e.g., Parisi et al, 2011; Lane & Zelinski, 2003; Rickenbach, Almeida, Seeman, & Lachman, 2014; Zelinski, Gilewski, & Schaie, 1993). While longitudinal studies have documented declines in objectively measured memory with both normal and pathological aging, it is unclear whether changes in laboratory measured memory are associated with greater reported everyday memory lapses.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adams-Price and Gonzales [36] found that “absent-mindedness” – involving distractions, disruptions from routines, or forgetting to implement a strategy one typically relies on – was frequently involved in older adults’ everyday memory problems (e.g., forgetting to take medications) [see also 37]. Other studies have found connections between memory complaints and self-reported stress, at a global level [27, 38] or within persons on a daily level [39, 40]. Apparently stressful, high-demand contexts may interfere with normal routines that support memory and increase the chances of everyday memory failures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most have focused upon middle aged and older adults (Almela, van der Meij, Hidalgo, Villada, & Salvador, 2012; Evans et al, 2011; Evans, Hucklebridge, Loveday, & Clow, 2012; Franz et al, 2011; Rickenbach, Almeida, Seeman, & Lachman, 2014) because higher cortisol, specifically higher diurnal cortisol output, has been linked to poorer cognition in this age group (Lupien et al, 2005). Long-term increases in diurnal cortisol output have been related to worse declarative memory (Li et al, 2006; Lupien et al, 1994, 1998; Seeman, McEwen, Singer, Albert, & Rowe, 1997) and executive functioning (Li et al, 2006), cognitive domains typically found to decline with age (Park et al, 2002; Rönnlund, Nyberg, BĂ€ckman, & Nilsson, 2005; Schaie & Willis, 1996).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%