2018
DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2018.1445879
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Daily scheduling of caregivers with stochastic times

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We found that the OR literature concerning HHC remains dominated by papers proposing models and solution methods for combinations of operational decisions concerning the rostering of staff, the allocation of staff to patient visits, the scheduling of visits and the routing of staff. Previous reviews (Ciss e et al, 2017 andHirsch, 2017) have suggested a need for more stochastic formulations in such models and our review found that recent work has indeed incorporated stochastic patient demand, staff travel times and service times (for instance Shi et al, 2017aShi et al, , 2017bShi et al, , 2018Yuan et al, 2018;Cappanera et al, 2018). Other advances since previous reviews include moves to explore alternative approaches to the multiple aspects of system performance acknowledged to be important in HHC, with for instance Liu et al (2018) and Carello et al (2018) using multi-objective optimisation, as suggested by Ciss e et al 2017.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We found that the OR literature concerning HHC remains dominated by papers proposing models and solution methods for combinations of operational decisions concerning the rostering of staff, the allocation of staff to patient visits, the scheduling of visits and the routing of staff. Previous reviews (Ciss e et al, 2017 andHirsch, 2017) have suggested a need for more stochastic formulations in such models and our review found that recent work has indeed incorporated stochastic patient demand, staff travel times and service times (for instance Shi et al, 2017aShi et al, , 2017bShi et al, , 2018Yuan et al, 2018;Cappanera et al, 2018). Other advances since previous reviews include moves to explore alternative approaches to the multiple aspects of system performance acknowledged to be important in HHC, with for instance Liu et al (2018) and Carello et al (2018) using multi-objective optimisation, as suggested by Ciss e et al 2017.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Analytical derivation of optimal solution Genetic algorithm (Shi et al, 2017b) Simulated annealing (Shi et al, 2018) Branch and price (Yuan et al, 2015;Yuan et al, 2018) Not specified -commercially available software Errarhout et al, 2016) Cardinality-constrained approach (n ¼ 2)…”
Section: Or Approaches In Hhcmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Each task is necessarily performed for a certain duration, which can be requested using either a fixed constant ( Cappanera et al, 2018 , Gomes and Ramos, 2019 , Liu et al, 2017 , Maya Duque et al, 2015 ) or a flexible range ( Mosquera et al, 2019 ). Yuan et al, 2018 , Shi et al, 2018 assume that the service duration is a random variable with known probability distributions, while Shi et al (2019) describe an uncertainty set for the service duration. Mosquera et al (2019) define the lower and upper bound of the duration ( ) for each visit t , such that a visit always has a minimum and maximum duration of and time units, respectively.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In their solution approach, a label-correcting algorithm is applied to the lunch break constraints and in the column generation process, some acceleration strategies are used, as well. Yuan et al (2018) proposed a daily HHCRSP with considering non-deterministic travel and service times. These assumptions are derived from possible changes in the patient health status and road traffic conditions that are valid in the practical world of HHC.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%