Daily relationship quality in same-sex couples: Attachment and sacrifice motives.

Abstract

Previous researchers examining romantic couples' dynamics have highlighted important behaviors, such as sacrifice motives, that can enhance or detract from relationship quality. It is equally as important to understand what individual characteristics contribute to these relationship behaviors. We examined how daily sacrifice motives (i.e., approach and avoidance) and attachment insecurity (i.e., anxiety and avoidance) interact to predict relationship quality in a sample of 81 same-sex couples (58 ϭ female, 23 ϭ male couples). Using 14-day daily diary data, we hypothesized that daily approach motives would be positively associated with relationship quality, whereas daily avoidance motives would be negatively associated with relationship quality. As expected, results showed a positive association between daily approach motives, and a negative association between avoidance motives, and relationship quality; however, these associations were moderated by attachment insecurity and gender. Specifically, we found that approach motives were associated with greater relationship quality, and avoidance motives with lower relationship quality, for women low in attachment insecurity and men high in attachment insecurity. Results highlight the importance of understanding the nuances in the associations among sacrifice motives, attachment, and relationship quality, for men and women in same-sex relationships.

Partners’ Consensus About Joint Effort and COVID-19 Prevention Among Sexual Minority Men

“…Relationship functioning was assessed using an abbreviated version of the Perceived Relationship Quality Component (PRQC) scale (Fletcher et al, 2000 ), a measure that has been used in studies of heterosexual couples (Muusses et al, 2015 ; Silva et al, 2017 ) as well as SMM couples (Cooper et al, 2017 ; Godfrey et al, 2021 ). The survey included four of the six PRCQ domains.…”

The Gender‐as‐Relational Approach for Theorizing About Romantic Relationships of Sexual and Gender Minority Mid‐ to Later‐Life Adults

“…Yet research within a GAR approach allows us to examine relationship dynamics in multiple contexts, comparing couples with two men or two women and testing whether his and hers marriages might extend to these contexts. These studies show that there are gender differences when comparing relationships between two men and two women in the determinants of relationship quality (Cooper et al, ; Pollitt, Robinson, & Umberson, ). For example, Pollitt et al (), in their study of midlife couples, found that greater gender conformity is associated with more shared power and with greater marital quality in same‐sex men couples and different‐sex couples, but not in same‐sex women couples.…”

The role of risk regulation in intimate relationships among individuals with social anxiety disorder and healthy controls

“…In one of the first such studies, Wills, Weiss, and Patterson (1974) examined the association between partner behaviours over a 2-week period and global assessments of marital satisfaction (Laurenceau & Bolger, 2005). Diary studies have since been used to assess a variety of questions about intimate relationships, including how relationship satisfaction, intimacy, and functioning are influenced by factors such as attachment styles (Campbell, Simpson, Boldry, & Kashy, 2005;Cooper, Totenhagen, Curran, Randall, & Smith, 2017;Overall & Sibley, 2008), evaluation of and regard for one's partner (Kanat-Maymon, Argaman, & Roth, 2017;LeBel & Campbell, 2012), selfesteem (DeHart, Tennen, Armeli, Todd, & Affleck, 2008), negative interactions within the relationship (Li & Fung, 2013), time devoted to the relationship and to work (Repetti, 1989;Unger, Niessen, Sonnentag, Neff, 2014), and physical intimacy (Debrot, Schoebi, Perrez, & Horn, 2013).…”