2017
DOI: 10.1007/s10826-017-0871-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Daily Peer Hassles and Non-Suicidal Self-Injury in Adolescence: Gender Differences in Avoidance-Focused Emotion Regulation Processes

Abstract: This study aimed to examine the mediating role of rumination, experiential avoidance, dissociation and depressive symptoms in the association between daily peer hassles and non-suicidal self-injury among adolescents. Additionally, this study explored gender differences in these associations and tested whether the proposed model was invariant across genders. The sample consisted of 776 adolescents, of them 369 are males (47.6%) and 407 are females (52.4%), aged between 12 and 18 years old from middle and high s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

2
13
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
(73 reference statements)
2
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Regarding gender differences, we found that NSSI was more likely to occur in males, which was consistent with some previous studies [32,45], but there were also studies showing the opposite results [34,46]. This may relate to the impulsive personality that is significantly associated with males [47].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Regarding gender differences, we found that NSSI was more likely to occur in males, which was consistent with some previous studies [32,45], but there were also studies showing the opposite results [34,46]. This may relate to the impulsive personality that is significantly associated with males [47].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The relationships between perceived social support and suicidal ideation and NSSI were mediated by depression symptoms, supporting our second hypothesis (Baetens et al., 2015; Cho & Glassner, 2019; Plener et al., 2015). Previous studies indicated that adolescents who report being hassled by their peers on a daily basis have more depression symptoms, which enhance the risk of NSSI (Xavier et al., 2018). Similarly, depression symptoms were found to mediate the relationships between suicidal ideation and academic stress (Ang & Huan, 2006) or perceived social support (Shilubane et al., 2014) among adolescents.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As for the indirect effect of stressful life events on NSSI through depressive symptoms, we found in our longitudinal analysis that depressive symptoms played a full mediating role in girls, but not in boys. This finding is partially consistent with a previous cross‐sectional study, investigating the relationship between daily peer hassles and self‐injury, which indicated that girls are more likely to respond to daily hassles with depressive symptoms and subsequently engage in self‐injury than boys (Xavier, Cunha, & Pinto‐Gouveia, 2018). The full mediation effect of depressive symptoms suggests that stressful life events may not precipitate occurrences of girls’ NSSI directly, but rather through the impact that stressful life events have on their depressive symptoms, which in turn increase the risk of further NSSI for the emotion‐regulation function.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This vulnerability can be explained from neurobiological and physiological perspectives, as females usually have increased endocrine and/or arousal responses to stress compared with males (Bangasser & Valentino, 2014), and girls are usually more advanced in pubertal development than boys, which has been found to amplify the relationship of interpersonal stress and NSSI (Miller et al, 2018). Also, girls are more likely to experience a higher level of negative emotional response to stress (Xavier et al, 2018). When facing negative emotions, migrant boys adopted more positive cognitive emotion regulation strategies than girls did (T. Wang, Li, & Sun, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%