2013
DOI: 10.1089/jpm.2012.0617
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Daily Oral Ketamine for the Treatment of Depression and Anxiety in Patients Receiving Hospice Care: A 28-Day Open-Label Proof-of-Concept Trial

Abstract: Background: Depression and anxiety are prevalent and undertreated in patients receiving hospice care. Standard antidepressants do not work rapidly or often enough to benefit most of these patients. Ketamine has many properties that make it an interesting candidate for rapidly treating depression and anxiety in patients receiving hospice care. To test this hypothesis, a 28-day, open-label, proof-of-concept trial of daily oral ketamine administration was conducted in order to evaluate the tolerability, potential… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
87
0
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 138 publications
(100 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
(56 reference statements)
4
87
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, the palliative field has shown great interest in the potential for the use of ketamine in the management of depressive symptoms at the end of life (Irwin et al 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, the palliative field has shown great interest in the potential for the use of ketamine in the management of depressive symptoms at the end of life (Irwin et al 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…39 Interestingly, both oral and sublingual ketamine have been trialled in depression. In a 4-week, proof-of-concept study, Irwin et al 40 administered oral ketamine (0.5 mg/ kg/d) to 14 mildly anxious and depressed patients in hospice care. Four patients dropped out because of nonresponse, and 2, for reasons unrelated to ketamine.…”
Section: Parting Notesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While more work is needed to further explore repeated dosing, other studies have examined alternative methods of delivery: oral [Irwin and Iglewicz, 2010;Paslakis et al 2010;Irwin et al 2013;De Gioannis and De Leo, 2014], intramuscular [Cusin et al 2012], sublingual [Lara et al 2013], and most recently, intranasal [Lapidus et al 2014], which will be reviewed in detail as follows.…”
Section: Alternative Modes Of Administrationmentioning
confidence: 99%